US calls for balanced approach to global shipping emissions plan amid UN climate talks
Washington — The United States has urged for a fair and economically balanced approach to global efforts to reduce emissions from international shipping, emphasizing the importance of climate action that does not burden developing economies or disrupt global trade.
The comments came as the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a specialized United Nations agency, prepares to vote next week on its much-debated Net-Zero Framework — a global proposal aimed at cutting carbon dioxide emissions from the international shipping sector. The sector currently accounts for nearly 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions and handles close to 80% of world trade.
U.S. officials reaffirmed their commitment to sustainable shipping and innovation but expressed concerns about the proposed framework’s economic implications. In a joint statement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Energy Secretary Chris Wright, and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said that while the United States supports the goal of reducing emissions, it will “oppose any international mechanism that unfairly penalizes trade, consumers, or energy accessibility.”
Encouraging innovation over taxation
According to U.S. officials, the administration prefers incentivizing innovation, technology, and cleaner fuels in the maritime industry rather than adopting measures that could lead to excessive costs or disrupt supply chains. “The administration supports responsible decarbonization through collaboration, technological advancement, and investment — not through punitive taxes or restrictive global mandates,” the statement read.
Officials also underscored that Washington remains open to working with international partners to craft an effective and equitable emissions reduction strategy that aligns environmental sustainability with economic stability.
“The maritime industry plays a crucial role in global connectivity and economic growth,” the statement continued. “Any transition toward cleaner shipping must ensure energy security, protect workers, and maintain affordable access to goods and transport services.”
A call for cooperation and balance
The IMO’s proposed Net-Zero Framework aims to establish a global system of financial contributions from ship operators to fund decarbonization efforts, including investment in renewable marine fuels and carbon capture technology. Proponents argue that a unified regulatory system would accelerate global climate action while reducing the risk of fragmented regional policies.
Environmental advocates and major container carriers have welcomed the initiative, viewing it as a necessary step to reach the industry’s 2050 net-zero goals. However, several developing countries and oil-exporting economies have expressed apprehension, warning that the proposal could disproportionately affect nations dependent on maritime trade or fossil fuel exports.
In its statement, the U.S. administration echoed similar concerns, noting that “climate solutions should not evolve into an unsanctioned global tax regime that harms developing nations and increases consumer costs.”
Toward sustainable global trade
Despite differing positions on the IMO’s proposal, U.S. officials reaffirmed that Washington remains deeply committed to the long-term goal of sustainable maritime transport. The U.S. is continuing to fund research and partnerships focused on cleaner propulsion systems, hydrogen and ammonia-based fuels, and digital tools that improve fuel efficiency across the sector.
The U.S. has also been an active participant in global maritime sustainability dialogues, collaborating with the European Union, Japan, and Pacific Island nations on low-carbon shipping routes and the development of “green corridors” between major ports.
“America’s leadership in clean energy innovation is driving real progress,” said Secretary Wright. “We believe in a future where environmental responsibility and economic strength go hand in hand.”
Global reactions and path forward
As the IMO prepares for next week’s vote, diplomats and maritime experts stress the importance of maintaining unity among member states. Many see the upcoming discussions as a chance to align environmental ambition with realistic implementation strategies.
“While there are legitimate differences in approach, the world’s major economies share the same goal: to build a cleaner, more sustainable shipping industry,” said one international maritime analyst. “Constructive engagement, rather than confrontation, will be key.”
Global shipping companies have also expressed optimism that an eventual compromise could emerge. Many firms are already investing in new vessel technologies and renewable fuels, anticipating stricter emissions rules in the years ahead.
Ultimately, the debate reflects a broader global challenge — balancing the urgent need to combat climate change with the equally vital goal of maintaining stable, inclusive economic growth. As the United States and its international partners navigate these discussions, experts agree that cooperative solutions remain the most promising path forward.
