A proposed genetically modified mustard crop in Canada is intensifying divisions between farmers seeking climate resilience and an export-dependent industry wary of losing premium global markets that demand non-GMO produce.

Dallas Leduc, a fourth-generation farmer in Saskatchewan, sees promise in the new genetically modified mustard hybrid being developed by BASF. Farming more than 10,000 acres in a region marked by sandy soils and persistent drought stress, Leduc said the crop could improve yields and profitability in an increasingly challenging environment.

He described the innovation as a practical tool to sustain farm incomes under harsh climatic conditions.The new crop, designed to produce oil similar to canola while tolerating herbicides, is expected to be more resilient in arid conditions where traditional canola often fails. BASF aims to secure regulatory approval in the United States as early as next year, with Canadian commercialization expected to follow within a few years.

However, the technology has drawn strong opposition from mustard growers and exporters who rely on strict non-GMO standards in key overseas markets. Trent Dewar, a Saskatchewan farmer producing specialty mustard for international buyers, warned that even minimal contamination from genetically modified crops could undermine Canada’s reputation as a reliable supplier of non-GMO mustard.

Mustard exports, valued at around $150 million annually, are small compared to Canada’s canola sector, which generates approximately $8.9 billion. Yet for producers in semi-arid regions such as Palliser’s Triangle, mustard has historically provided a stable income where other crops struggle.

Industry representatives say the risk of cross-contamination is significant because the genetically modified hybrid and traditional mustard belong to the same species, Brassica juncea. This allows pollen from one crop to fertilize the other, raising concerns about unintended mixing through wind or pollinators.

Norm Hall, chair of Sask Mustard, said the industry is lobbying federal authorities to block the introduction of the new crop, citing the potential impact on export markets. He described resistance among growers as widespread, noting that many had not anticipated such a development being considered.

France, which imports roughly half of its mustard seed from Canada, maintains strict non-GMO standards. Christophe Planes, sales and marketing director at French processor Reine de Dijon, said the company systematically tests all supplies to ensure compliance. He indicated that the presence of genetically modified traces, even at low levels, could disrupt sourcing decisions.

Contracts reviewed by Reuters show that many buyers require non-GMO certification, although specific tolerance thresholds are often determined by individual purchasers. Industry participants say this ambiguity adds to uncertainty about how markets would respond if contamination were detected.

Canada’s mustard sector remains sensitive to historical precedent. In 2009, traces of a genetically modified flax variety known as Triffid were found in European shipments, leading to a collapse in exports that have yet to fully recover. Growers and exporters say this episode underscores the risks associated with introducing genetically modified crops into supply chains reliant on strict quality standards.

Peter Gorski of Broadgrain, which markets Canadian specialty crops globally, said international buyers view contamination risks with extreme caution. He compared the potential presence of GMO material in mustard shipments to a foreign object in food products, reflecting the severity of market reactions.

BASF, for its part, maintains that safeguards can be implemented to prevent cross-contamination. Brent Collins, who heads the company’s seeds and traits division in Canada, described the hybrid as a necessary innovation that could expand canola production into new areas and meet growing global demand for vegetable oils.

The company estimates that up to two million acres could eventually be cultivated with the hybrid crop across Canada and the United States, particularly in regions where existing oilseed varieties perform poorly. Collins said BASF is working to address growers’ concerns and ensure coexistence between genetically modified and traditional crops.

Industry groups remain unconvinced. Rick Mitzel, executive director of Sask Mustard, said coexistence is not feasible given the biological characteristics of the plant. He argued that even small-scale adoption could jeopardize the integrity of non-GMO supply chains.

The debate reflects broader tensions between technological innovation and market access in global agriculture. While genetically modified crops can enhance productivity and resilience, their acceptance varies widely across regions, particularly in Europe, where regulatory frameworks and consumer preferences remain restrictive.

The stakes extend beyond Canadian producers. Kacy Gehring of Mountain States Oilseeds in Idaho said uncertainty surrounding GMO contamination could discourage farmers from growing mustard altogether, potentially affecting global supply chains and food manufacturing.

Despite the concerns, some farmers remain committed to adopting the new technology. Leduc acknowledged the risks but said economic pressures leave little choice. Operating in a region increasingly affected by drought and climate variability, he said access to more resilient crops could be critical to maintaining viability.

The divide between proponents and opponents has widened as commercialization approaches, with industry meetings reflecting growing urgency among traditional mustard stakeholders.

Calls for legal and political action have intensified, although representatives acknowledge that regulatory frameworks in Canada do not typically consider market impacts when approving new crop technologies.

In a report titled “Humanity Must Win,” the London-based rights group urged FIFA and host governments to take “urgent action” to ensure the safety and rights of players, supporters and local populations during the tournament, which begins on June 11.

Amnesty said FIFA’s pledge to deliver a tournament where everyone feels “safe, included and free to exercise their rights” contrasts with conditions in host nations, particularly the United States, which will stage the majority of the 104 matches.

The organization described the U.S. as facing a “human rights emergency” under Donald Trump, citing mass deportations, arbitrary arrests and what it characterized as “paramilitary-style” operations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). It noted that ICE officials have indicated the agency will play a central role in World Cup security arrangements.

The report also referenced public backlash following the killing of two U.S. citizens during protests against ICE raids in Minneapolis earlier this year.Gaps in fan protection measuresAmnesty said host city plans published so far do not clearly address how fans or residents would be shielded from immigration enforcement during the tournament.

It added that supporters from some participating nations, including Ivory Coast, Haiti, Iran and Senegal, could face travel restrictions to the United States.LGBTQ+ fan groups in Europe have also indicated reluctance to attend matches in the U.S., citing concerns over protections for transgender individuals.

FIFA has said the expanded 48-team tournament the largest in World Cup history will proceed as scheduled, with all qualified teams expected to participate. The governing body has not publicly responded to Amnesty’s latest report.

The organization expects to generate around $11 billion in revenue from the 2026 World Cup cycle, drawing renewed scrutiny from rights groups over its responsibilities toward stakeholders.

Steve Cockburn, Amnesty’s head of economic and social justice, said that while FIFA stands to benefit financially, “fans, communities, players, journalists and workers cannot be made to pay the price.

”The tournament is set to open in Mexico City and conclude on July 19 at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey.

Finland has been ranked the world’s happiest country in the latest World Happiness Report, which also highlighted concerns over the impact of heavy social media use on youth well-being, particularly on platforms driven by algorithmic content and influencer culture.

The 2026 report found that increased time spent on social media is associated with declining well-being among young people in several regions, with researchers pointing to structural features of platforms as a key factor shaping user experience and mental health outcomes.

Researchers involved in the report said that while social media remains a central mode of interaction for younger populations, its effects vary significantly depending on how platforms are designed and used. Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, one of the contributors to the report, said there is a need to restore the original purpose of online interaction.

“It is clear that we should look as much as possible to put the ‘social’ back into social media,” De Neve said, underscoring concerns that current platform dynamics may be undermining meaningful engagement.

The report identified heavy social media use as an important contributing factor to declining youth well-being in some countries, although it stopped short of presenting it as the sole cause. Researchers noted that broader social, cultural and economic factors also play a role in shaping outcomes.

According to the findings, platforms that rely heavily on algorithmic feeds, promote influencers and prioritize visual content tend to have more negative associations with well-being. These features, the report said, encourage social comparison, which can adversely affect users’ perceptions of themselves and their lives.

By contrast, platforms that primarily facilitate direct communication between users were associated with relatively better outcomes. The distinction highlights how platform architecture, rather than mere usage levels, can influence the psychological effects of digital interaction.

Researchers emphasized that these patterns are not uniform across regions. In parts of the Middle East and South America, the relationship between social media use and well-being appears to be more positive, and youth well-being has not shown the same levels of decline despite high usage rates.

The report attributed these differences to a range of factors that vary by region, including social norms, patterns of use and broader societal conditions.

Finland retained its position at the top of the global happiness rankings, continuing a trend seen in recent years. The report’s broader findings also pointed to a shift in the geographic distribution of high-ranking countries.

For the second consecutive year, none of the English-speaking countries featured in the top 10. The United States ranked 23rd, Canada 25th and Britain 29th, reflecting a relative decline compared to other regions.

The rankings are based on a range of indicators that assess quality of life and subjective well-being, though the report highlighted that digital behavior is emerging as an increasingly relevant factor in shaping these outcomes.

The report’s focus on social media comes amid growing policy attention worldwide, as governments assess the potential risks posed by digital platforms to younger users. Several countries have already introduced restrictions or are considering bans on social media use for minors.

Researchers said the findings could inform ongoing regulatory discussions by highlighting how specific design features of platforms may influence user well-being. The emphasis on algorithm-driven content and visual engagement aligns with broader concerns raised by policymakers and public health experts.

While the report does not prescribe specific policy measures, it points to the need for a more nuanced understanding of how digital environments interact with social and psychological factors.

“It is clear that we should look as much as possible to put the ‘social’ back into social media.”

The Kingdom’s participation as an invited country highlights its expanding engagement in international affairs and its constructive contribution to addressing global challenges.

The meeting, hosted and chaired by Canada, brings together leaders and ministers from the world’s major economies. It provides an important platform for dialogue on critical global issues, including economic stability, energy security, and maritime safety, as well as cooperation on vital minerals and supply chain resilience.

Saudi Arabia’s invitation to the G7 meeting reflects the international community’s growing recognition of its strategic influence in global affairs.

Under Vision 2030, the Kingdom has pursued an ambitious agenda of economic diversification, environmental sustainability, and international collaboration, aligning its national goals with the world’s shared interests.

Prince Faisal’s presence at this high-level gathering underscores the Kingdom’s active diplomatic engagement and its ongoing efforts to promote peace, stability, and sustainable development worldwide.

Through constructive dialogue and multilateral cooperation, Saudi Arabia continues to strengthen its partnerships with leading economies and key international organizations.

During the two-day meeting, the discussions are expected to focus on strengthening collective efforts to ensure maritime and energy security, particularly in regions vital to global trade.

As one of the world’s leading energy producers and a major advocate of clean energy transition, Saudi Arabia brings valuable insights into balancing energy sustainability and global security.

The Foreign Minister’s participation also highlights Saudi Arabia’s pivotal role in promoting economic cooperation and innovation across borders.

The Kingdom’s growing investments in green energy, digital transformation, and circular carbon economy initiatives demonstrate its commitment to building a sustainable future while contributing to global economic growth.

By engaging in the G7 dialogue, Saudi Arabia aims to enhance international coordination on key geopolitical issues, including regional peace, trade stability, and climate action.

The Kingdom’s approach emphasizes dialogue, respect, and shared prosperity, values that continue to define its foreign policy under the leadership of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

Prince Faisal is expected to hold bilateral meetings with several foreign ministers during his visit, focusing on expanding cooperation in various sectors such as energy, technology, investment, and security.

These discussions reflect Saudi Arabia’s vision of fostering mutually beneficial partnerships that drive innovation and ensure global stability.

The Kingdom’s inclusion in such a prestigious international forum also underscores its increasing influence as a bridge between the Global North and Global South.

With its strategic position, strong economy, and forward-looking policies, Saudi Arabia continues to serve as a reliable partner in addressing transnational challenges.

As the G7 nations discuss critical issues like global supply chains, sustainable energy, and geopolitical tensions, Saudi Arabia’s participation demonstrates its readiness to contribute solutions and share experiences drawn from its own successful reform journey.

This participation reaffirms the Kingdom’s position as a responsible global player dedicated to constructive engagement and balanced diplomacy.

The visit of Prince Faisal bin Farhan to Canada is a testament to Saudi Arabia’s ongoing diplomatic outreach and commitment to shaping a more cooperative and secure world.

Through active participation in major international discussions, the Kingdom continues to strengthen its role as a leader in global dialogue and regional stability.

With Vision 2030 guiding its path, Saudi Arabia’s diplomatic momentum continues to reflect optimism, collaboration, and innovation — values that are driving its transformation into a modern, globally connected nation with a sustainable and prosperous future.

President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Carney’s actions reflected Canada’s dedication to fostering stability, mutual respect, and balanced global trade relationships amid a rapidly evolving economic landscape.

During the summit, Carney addressed a recent political advertisement that had caused tensions between Canada and the United States.

He clarified that he had personally apologized to President Trump for the misunderstanding and emphasized Canada’s respect for its close ally.

By taking personal responsibility and reinforcing dialogue, Carney highlighted his government’s focus on maintaining friendly relations and promoting open communication between Ottawa and Washington.

Carney revealed that the advertisement, which featured a quote from former U.S. President Ronald Reagan about the dangers of tariffs, was not supported by him.

The ad was commissioned by Ontario Premier Doug Ford, but Carney explained that he had opposed its release, demonstrating his leadership in managing political differences while preserving Canada’s diplomatic integrity.

His quick response and willingness to extend an apology helped ease tensions and prevent further disruption in bilateral trade discussions.

At the same time, Carney’s meeting with President Trump during a dinner hosted by South Korean President Lee Jae-myung was described as cordial and positive.

Both leaders exchanged views on trade cooperation, investment opportunities, and mutual goals for regional stability. The interaction was seen as a step toward restoring confidence between the two countries, even as trade negotiations remain paused.

Carney’s diplomatic tour across Asia showcased Canada’s growing ambition to expand economic partnerships beyond North America. In his remarks, he underscored the importance of diversifying Canada’s trade relationships to reduce dependence on a single market.

“It can’t happen overnight, but we’re moving very fast,” Carney said, emphasizing that Canada aims to deepen its engagement with Asia through innovation, investment, and cultural exchange.

A major highlight of Carney’s trip was his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, marking the first high-level discussion between the two nations in nearly a decade.

The meeting symbolized a turning point in Canada-China relations after years of strain. Both leaders discussed cooperation in technology, trade, and global security, focusing on rebuilding trust and strengthening collaboration on shared challenges such as climate action and economic growth.

Carney’s diplomatic tone and practical approach drew praise from analysts, who noted that his balanced engagement with both the U.S. and China positions Canada as a mediator in global trade.

His willingness to address sensitive topics, such as foreign interference and human rights, while maintaining a spirit of cooperation reflected a new era of Canadian foreign policy — one rooted in integrity, pragmatism, and partnership.

The Asia-Pacific summit also provided Carney an opportunity to reaffirm Canada’s commitment to regional stability and sustainable development.

His participation in high-level dialogues highlighted Canada’s readiness to contribute to global economic recovery through innovation, digital transformation, and inclusive trade policies.

Throughout the trip, Carney maintained a message of optimism and collaboration, underscoring that diplomacy, respect, and open dialogue are the foundation of Canada’s foreign policy.

By balancing strong ties with traditional allies like the United States while expanding partnerships in Asia, Carney positioned Canada as a forward-looking nation ready to lead in an interconnected global economy.

The success of Carney’s engagements in South Korea and beyond reinforced Canada’s image as a nation dedicated to peace, cooperation, and mutual prosperity.

As trade relations evolve and new alliances form, Carney’s diplomatic approach signals a future where Canada continues to build bridges across continents, supporting a more resilient and inclusive world economy.

The promise of a better life comes with a heavy price—both financially and emotionally.

For thousands of Indian students, Canada has long been seen as a land of opportunity—a place where they can receive a world-class education, secure a stable future, and build a better life. However, a recent viral Reddit post has shattered this illusion, offering a raw and unfiltered look into the struggles many international students face in Canada. From financial exploitation to crushing loneliness, the challenges are far greater than most anticipate.

The Dream vs. The Reality

Many Indian students invest their family’s life savings or take hefty loans to pursue higher education in Canada, believing it will be a stepping stone to success. Unfortunately, the reality is often far from the glossy brochures and promotional videos. Instead of high-quality education and promising job prospects, they find themselves burdened with outdated curriculums, exorbitant tuition fees, and institutions that seem more interested in profits than in providing meaningful education.

Financial Struggles and Exploitation

The financial strain on international students is immense. With tuition fees often three to four times higher than those for domestic students, many struggle to make ends meet. The high cost of living—especially rent, groceries, and transportation—adds to the burden. Many students are forced to take on survival jobs, such as working in warehouses, restaurants, or as Uber drivers, just to afford basic necessities.

To make matters worse, the lack of “Canadian experience” means that finding a job related to their field of study is nearly impossible. Many employers hesitate to hire international students, leaving them stuck in low-paying, physically demanding jobs. Some students even face exploitation, working for less than the legal minimum wage under the table, with no job security or benefits.

Mental Health and Social Isolation

Beyond financial struggles, the emotional toll of studying abroad is overwhelming. Leaving behind family, friends, and the cultural familiarity of home can lead to extreme loneliness and mental health issues. Many students miss out on festivals, social gatherings, and the support systems they once relied on. The pressure to succeed, coupled with long hours of work and study, often leads to anxiety, depression, and burnout.

The lack of a strong social network further exacerbates these problems. Unlike domestic students, international students do not have childhood friends or extended family members to rely on. Making new connections can be challenging, especially when time is consumed by work and studies.

A Wake-Up Call for Aspiring Students

The viral Reddit post serves as a stark warning to those considering studying abroad. While Canada does offer opportunities, the path is far more difficult than many realize. The promise of a better life comes with a heavy price—both financially and emotionally.

This raises an important question: Is studying abroad truly worth it? With India’s growing economy and increasing job opportunities, staying rooted and working smart may be a better alternative. Rather than chasing an uncertain future in a foreign land, students must carefully weigh their options and make informed decisions.

Think Before You Leap

For those considering studying abroad, thorough research is essential. Speak with current and former students, understand the real cost of living, and evaluate whether the investment will truly pay off. Education is an important step towards a successful future, but it should not come at the cost of financial ruin and emotional distress.

Canada may still be a viable option for some, but for many, the dream sold to them is far from reality. Stay informed, stay grounded, and make choices that will lead to a fulfilling and sustainable future—whether at home or abroad.

The delegation, led by Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan, was received by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in Ottawa. The officials engaged in talks with Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly to address the escalating conflict in Gaza.

The discussions primarily focused on the recent developments in Gaza and the severe consequences faced by the Palestinian population due to Israel’s military escalation. In an official statement, the Saudi Foreign Ministry highlighted the delegation’s call for the international community to promptly assume its responsibility in protecting civilians.

They emphasized that any discussions regarding Gaza’s future and the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict should only take place after an immediate ceasefire and the cessation of unwarranted military aggression.

The delegation stressed the crucial need for the establishment of relief corridors to facilitate the delivery of urgent humanitarian, food, and medical aid to Gaza. Additionally, they emphasized that political conditions must be created to pave the way for the establishment of a Palestinian state. The delegation firmly rejected any attempts to isolate Gaza’s future from the wider Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Expressing dissatisfaction with the UN Security Council’s failure to pass a resolution calling for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, the ministers voiced their concern over the expanding scope of deliberate attacks carried out by Israeli forces against Palestinian civilians. They further condemned the repeated violations of international law in the region.

Prior to their visit to Canada, the delegation met with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, following the United States’ veto of the resolution. The foreign ministers from Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the Palestinian Authority collectively expressed their disappointment with the Security Council’s inability to reach a consensus.

Health officials in the besieged enclave of Gaza reported that the death toll has now surpassed 17,700, with women and children accounting for 70 percent of the fatalities. Moreover, more than 46,000 individuals have been wounded in the ongoing conflict. The majority of Gaza’s population, which exceeds 2 million people, have been forcibly displaced from their homes as a result of the hostilities.

The visit of the Arab and Turkish foreign ministers to Canada underscores the pressing need for an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip. The delegation’s call for the international community to protect civilians and provide vital humanitarian assistance reflects the gravity of the situation.

Speaking with reporters on a flight from Athens late on Thursday, Erdogan said the United States agreed with Canada on the issue, but that Sweden’s NATO bid was to be decided by Turkey’s parliament, after he sent the bill there for consideration in late October.

When Erdogan signalled at a NATO conference in July that Sweden would eventually get the green light, NATO member Canada quietly agreed to re-open talks with Turkey on lifting export controls on drone parts, including optical equipment, Reuters reported.

“On the issue of drone cameras we wanted from them, Canada is insisting: Sweden, Sweden. The U.S. is repeating the same thing,” Erdogan said.

Turkey, a NATO member, asked in October 2021 to buy 40 Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT.N) F-16 fighters and 79 modernisation kits for its existing warplanes.

U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration backs the $20-billion sale, but there have been objections in the U.S. Congress over Turkey’s delaying of NATO enlargement to bring in Sweden, and over its human rights record.

“If you have your Congress, I have my parliament. You say you will take a step in the F-16 issue after passing through Congress. I also have a parliament,” Erdogan said.

“If we are two NATO allies, then do what you have to simultaneously, in solidarity, and our parliament will take the necessary decision.”

The Canadian embassy did not immediately comment on the matter.

The movement for a Sikh homeland in northern India, crushed decades ago, has burst onto the global stage in recent months as the United States and Canada accused Indian officials of involvement in assassination plots against Sikh separatist leaders in North America.

New Delhi denies any connection to a June murder in a Vancouver suburb but has announced an investigation into U.S. concerns about an alleged plot in New York. It says such plots were not government policy and it is not hunting down Sikh separatists abroad.

The diplomatic dust-ups with normally friendly Washington and Ottawa highlight the outsized role Sikh separatism plays in the political calculus of Modi’s Hindu-nationalist government, which is in a strong position to win national elections next year.

Indian security officials say they must crack down on what they call Sikh connections to crime overseas linked to the Sikh heartland of Punjab. Sikh nationalists reject that claim, saying Modi is trying to destroy their leadership and mobilise his Hindu base.

Other Modi critics say he is exploiting the issue for political gain after Sikh farmers dealt his government one of its biggest blows by forcing a rollback of agricultural reforms.

Sikh separatists demand that a homeland called Khalistan – “the land of the pure” – be carved out of Punjab, where their religion was founded around the end of the 15th century, and the only Indian state where they form a majority. Sikhs comprise fewer than 2% of India’s 1.4 billion people.

A Khalistan insurgency killed tens of thousands in the 1980s and 1990s before it was put down by New Delhi and ceased to be a significant issue domestically.

Dead Horse Or Mad Dog?

“Khalistan has no ground support in Punjab today,” said a senior Indian security official, but some prominent separatist leaders abroad “are involved in drugs, gun-running, crime syndicates and have links to Punjab too”.

A recently retired top Indian security official called Khalistan a “dead horse” but insisted “you have to act to pre-empt” as they are raising money abroad, training people and agitating for India’s division.

India “has to be careful”, he said, because issues are “boiling under the surface”, including unemployment and rampant drug use in Punjab, which borders on India’s archrival Pakistan.

Both officials asked not to be named given the current sensitivity of the issue.

India has not publicly released any recent evidence of Sikh separatist involvement with overseas crime, but New Delhi says it has repeatedly shared such evidence with foreign capitals.

An aggressive national security posture is an important element of Modi’s cultivated strongman image, built on actions including air strikes against Pakistan, ending special privileges for the disputed Kashmir region and targeting left-wing activists the government says are linked to Maoist militants.

Kanwarpal Singh, political secretary of the Punjab-based Dal Khalsa group, which lobbies for a separate Khalistan, rejected links to drugs or crime. Modi’s government is seeking to “defame, isolate and eliminate” Sikh separatist leaders, he said.

The policy is to “call the dog mad and shoot him”, he said.

Other critics of Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which has failed to make political inroads among Sikhs, accuse it of exaggerating the Khalistan problem for political gain.

“It is exploiting whatever limited Khalistani element there is in the country or in the diaspora to mobilise the Hindu population,” said security expert Ajai Sahni.

Dal Khalsa’s Singh said that after the yearlong 2021 farm protests by mostly Sikh farmers and activists bruised the BJP politically, “they are taking revenge on the Sikh community”.

The U.S. Justice Department said earlier on Wednesday it was charging a 52-year-old man who had worked with an Indian government employee on a plot to assassinate a New York City resident who advocated for a Sikh sovereign state in northern India.

The U.S. charges come about two months after Canada said there were “credible” allegations linking Indian agents to the murder of Sikh separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar in a Vancouver suburb, in June. India has rejected that allegation.

“The news coming out of the United States further underscores what we’ve been talking about from the very beginning, which is that India needs to take this seriously,” Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told reporters in Ottawa.

“The Indian government needs to work with us to ensure that we’re getting to the bottom of this,” he said.

Earlier on Wednesday, Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly urged India to be more forthcoming in the ongoing murder investigation. Canadian authorities have yet to charge anyone for the killing of Nijjar.

Referring to the Indian government, Joly told reporters: “Clearly we expect more cooperation on their part and more engagement on their part.”

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Both the United States and Canada are looking to build better ties with India to counter Chinese influence in the Indo-Pacific region, and the allegations undermine that effort.

Neither New Delhi nor Ottawa looks likely to take dramatic steps to reconcile soon as Canada’s murder investigation proceeds and Prime Minister Narendra Modi prepares for Indian national elections by May.