Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency reported the drone strike but did not immediately provide details on casualties, damage or the intended target.

The reported attack came less than 24 hours after the two countries agreed to a U.S.-mediated security framework designed to reduce violence along the frontier, where repeated exchanges of fire between Israeli forces and Hezbollah have raised concerns over a broader regional conflict.

Neither the Israeli military nor Lebanese authorities immediately commented on the reported strike, and no further operational details were available.

The new security arrangement seeks to stabilize the border after months of escalating hostilities that have displaced civilians on both sides and heightened regional security concerns. It remains unclear whether Saturday’s reported strike will affect implementation of the agreement.

Lebanon’s state news agency reported that the strike hit the town of Nabatieh Al-Fawqa, an area located outside the security zone shown on a map released by Israel depicting an expanded area under the control of its forces in southern Lebanon.

The Israeli military confirmed to Reuters that it had conducted the strike using a drone, stating that no Israeli ground forces were operating in the immediate vicinity at the time of the attack.

The military said the target was an individual who posed a threat to Israeli troops but did not identify the person or provide evidence supporting the claim.

The strike came less than 24 hours after Israel and Lebanon concluded a U.S.-mediated security framework aimed at easing cross-border tensions after months of exchanges of fire involving Hezbollah and Israeli forces. The agreement is intended to reduce the risk of renewed escalation along the frontier.

Lebanese authorities did not immediately report casualties or provide additional details on the incident. There was no immediate response from Hezbollah.

The military identified the soldier as Master Sergeant Alexander Filin, 29, and said he “fell in combat” during operations in southern Lebanon.

According to a military statement released on Thursday, the incident also left an officer, a reserve officer and a reserve soldier moderately wounded. A combat non-commissioned officer, two reserve soldiers and a female reserve soldier sustained light injuries.

The military did not immediately provide further details regarding the circumstances of the clash or the location where the casualties occurred.

The casualties were reported a day after the United States and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding intended to lay the groundwork for ending the broader Middle East conflict. The agreement calls for a halt in fighting across multiple fronts, including Lebanon, where hostilities have persisted for months.

Lebanon became directly involved in the regional conflict after the Iran-backed Hezbollah movement launched rocket attacks against Israel on March 2 in support of Tehran following the outbreak of hostilities involving Iran and its allies.

Israel subsequently expanded military operations in southern Lebanon, carrying out extensive airstrikes and ground offensives that it said were aimed at degrading Hezbollah’s military capabilities and preventing cross-border attacks.

Lebanese authorities say Israel’s military campaign has killed more than 3,800 people since fighting escalated earlier this year. The figures have not been independently verified.

On the Israeli side, military data indicate that 31 soldiers and one civilian contractor have been killed in connection with operations linked to the conflict since March 2, including the latest fatality.

The death of Filin comes as diplomatic negotiations continue over the future of Israeli troop deployments in southern Lebanon. Israeli officials have said they are engaged in discussions with the United States regarding the possible continuation of military deployments in areas seized during the conflict, while Washington has pushed for broader efforts to stabilize the region under the emerging U.S.-Iran framework.

Despite signs of reduced hostilities in recent days, the latest casualties highlight the continuing risks faced by forces operating in southern Lebanon and the challenges confronting negotiators seeking a durable ceasefire.

The meeting followed a summit in London earlier this week attended by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and the leaders of Britain, France and Germany. During the gathering, the three European countries expressed support for Kyiv’s proposal for direct talks with Moscow aimed at ending more than four years of conflict.

French Ambassador Nicolas de Riviere described the discussions at Russia’s Foreign Ministry as constructive and told reporters that a joint statement would be released later in the day.

Russia, however, characterized the talks differently, saying the ambassadors were informed of what Moscow described as the “destructive” Ukraine policies of their governments. The Russian Foreign Ministry accused Britain, France and Germany of seeking to prolong the conflict at Europe’s expense.

The diplomatic contact comes after Russian President Vladimir Putin rejected a proposal by Zelensky this month for a face-to-face meeting intended to advance peace negotiations.

At the London summit, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz endorsed Zelensky’s initiative and said the current battlefield positions should serve as a starting point for future negotiations.

Western European diplomats have had limited direct engagement with Russian authorities since Moscow launched its full-scale offensive against Ukraine. Contacts have largely been confined to formal summonses and diplomatic exchanges through established channels.

The meeting also reflects growing discussion within parts of Europe about whether renewed dialogue with Moscow could help create conditions for ending the conflict, which remains Europe’s largest war since World War Two.

Efforts led by the United States to broker a settlement have so far failed to produce a breakthrough. Diplomatic attention has also been increasingly diverted by the conflict involving Iran, complicating international attempts to advance negotiations on Ukraine.

Russia has generally preferred discussing the war with the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump and has repeatedly signaled opposition to a larger European role in any future settlement process.

Britain, France and Germany remain among Ukraine’s principal military, financial and diplomatic supporters and have consistently backed Kyiv throughout the conflict.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Russian newspaper Izvestia that the letter had been delivered to Putin overnight after first appearing in the media.

“Yes, overnight we already handed over the written version. What came from the media was passed on to the president, and he has reviewed it. The president has been briefed,” Peskov said.

Zelensky published the open letter on Thursday, calling for direct talks with Putin aimed at reaching an agreement to end the conflict. He said Ukraine remained prepared to continue fighting if no diplomatic breakthrough could be achieved.

The Ukrainian leader also sought to increase pressure on the Kremlin by arguing that Russians were growing weary of both the war and Putin’s leadership.

Peskov indicated that Putin could address the letter publicly later on Friday during a plenary session at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, one of Russia’s flagship annual economic gatherings.

The Kremlin has not yet provided a formal response to Zelensky’s proposal or indicated whether Putin would consider a direct meeting with the Ukrainian president.

The exchange comes as diplomatic efforts to end the conflict remain stalled and fighting continues more than four years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

In a telephone conversation, Lavrov stressed the importance of preventing a return to armed confrontation and reiterated that the conflict has no military solution, according to the ministry’s statement.

The call followed recent talks between the United States and Iran in Pakistan, which ended without agreement. Araqchi briefed Lavrov on the discussions, the ministry said, providing details of negotiations that failed to produce a settlement.

Russia has positioned itself as a potential mediator in the conflict, signaling willingness to engage diplomatically as tensions remain high despite a temporary ceasefire and ongoing international efforts to restart negotiations.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said the two sides, along with China, committed to continued dialogue after seven days of negotiations in the western Chinese city.

The parties agreed to address key issues in bilateral relations, with terrorism identified as the central concern affecting ties.

“The three parties agreed to explore a comprehensive solution to the issues in the relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan, and clarified the core and priority issues that need to be addressed,” Mao said at a regular press briefing in Beijing.Both Afghanistan and Pakistan pledged they would not take actions that could “escalate or complicate the situation,” according to the Chinese readout.

Afghanistan’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Abdul Qahar Balkhi said the talks concluded in a “constructive atmosphere,” focusing on security, bilateral relations and regional stability.

Writing on X, he thanked Beijing for facilitating the discussions and expressed hope the process would build trust and enhance cooperation.There was no immediate comment from Pakistan on the outcome of the talks.

The discussions were convened after fighting that began in February escalated into what Pakistan described as “open war,” including airstrikes inside Afghanistan, among them in the capital Kabul.

According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, the conflict has displaced about 94,000 people, while roughly 100,000 residents in two Afghan border districts have been cut off from assistance since the violence began.

Despite the talks, Afghan officials have continued to accuse Pakistan of cross-border shelling, while Islamabad has long alleged that Afghanistan provides safe haven to militants, including the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, an insurgent group allied with the Afghan Taliban.

Kabul denies the operations.

Officials emphasized that constructive engagement, not economic pressure, is the most effective path toward resolving disputes and restoring harmony along the shared frontier.

Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow noted that dialogue must remain independent from any discussions on trade or tariffs.

He stressed that linking unrelated issues to political negotiations can distort diplomatic efforts and hinder long-term peacebuilding.

Tensions resurfaced recently after isolated clashes escalated along the border, prompting concerns for civilian safety and regional stability.

Both countries experienced significant displacement of residents, highlighting the importance of immediate cooperation and calm.

Thailand’s leadership underscored that its priority is to protect its citizens while simultaneously encouraging a peaceful environment for talks.

Officials reiterated that meaningful dialogue can only take place when both sides demonstrate sincerity and willingness to step back from confrontation.

The government emphasized that negotiations should focus on reducing tensions and preventing misunderstandings between the two neighbouring nations.

Thailand expressed hope that Cambodia will engage responsibly and help create space for de-escalation and cooperation.

Despite renewed hostilities, Thailand maintains that external pressure—particularly through tariffs—should not be used as a tool to force diplomacy.

The foreign minister explained that economic discussions and security dialogue must remain clearly separated to avoid undermining trust.

Thailand continues to rely on established diplomatic channels within ASEAN to promote stability and encourage peaceful problem-solving.

Regional cooperation, officials said, remains fundamental to maintaining unity and resilience in Southeast Asia.

Leaders also highlighted that sustainable peace requires open communication and credible commitments from all parties involved in the dispute.

They stated that Cambodia’s willingness to halt hostilities would be a crucial first step in setting the stage for talks.

Thailand affirmed its readiness to listen and re-enter discussions once conditions are conducive to productive negotiation.

Officials noted that showing restraint, reducing aggression and building confidence are essential components of any renewed dialogue.

Cambodia has repeatedly said it intends to honour previous ceasefire arrangements, though Thailand has pointed to several incidents that have raised concern.

The recent exchanges underscore the need for stronger mechanisms to prevent flare-ups and maintain stability.

Thailand’s foreign minister stated that there are two paths ahead: continued tension or a commitment to peace and cooperation.

He expressed confidence that diplomatic engagement, when genuine, can restore calm along the border and strengthen bilateral ties.

The country has continued to take precautionary steps to secure affected areas while ensuring that any defensive measures remain measured and responsible.

Officials reassured the public that protecting human life and preventing escalation remain central to Thailand’s approach.

Both nations have a long history of cultural ties and economic interaction, making cooperation essential for long-term prosperity.

Thailand emphasized that peace is not only in the interest of the two countries but also vital for regional development and stability.

International observers have encouraged both nations to pursue dialogue and avoid actions that could worsen the situation.

Thailand welcomed international support while reiterating that durable peace must originate through genuine cooperation between the two neighbours.

As Thailand works toward reducing tensions, its leaders stressed the importance of diplomacy, patience and responsible decision-making.

The government remains hopeful that constructive engagement will ultimately pave the way for a peaceful and stable future for both sides.

The meeting brought together senior diplomats from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Pakistan, and Indonesia to discuss the latest developments in the Gaza Strip and ongoing regional efforts to promote peace, humanitarian support, and long-term stability.

The gathering demonstrated a strong commitment by regional powers to finding peaceful and sustainable solutions to the conflict and reaffirmed their collective responsibility toward supporting the Palestinian people.

During the meeting, the ministers discussed various diplomatic initiatives and recent peace proposals aimed at bringing an end to the violence in Gaza.

Emphasis was placed on the need for continued coordination among Muslim and regional countries to ensure the protection of civilians, the delivery of humanitarian assistance, and the establishment of a lasting ceasefire.

The ministers expressed their unified stance on the importance of dialogue, de-escalation, and respect for international law as foundations for achieving justice and stability in the region.

Prince Faisal bin Farhan reaffirmed Saudi Arabia’s unwavering position in supporting all efforts that lead to peace, security, and humanitarian relief in Gaza.

He highlighted the Kingdom’s consistent call for the protection of innocent lives and the delivery of aid to those affected by the ongoing crisis.

Saudi Arabia’s approach focuses on promoting unity among Arab and Islamic countries while emphasizing diplomatic engagement as the key to achieving a sustainable resolution that ensures dignity and peace for the Palestinian people.

The discussions also addressed the outcomes of the Sharm El-Sheikh Summit and the Global Alliance for the Implementation of the Two-State Solution, which was recently held in Riyadh.

These initiatives underscore Saudi Arabia’s leading role in advancing diplomatic efforts that uphold the rights of Palestinians and support the establishment of an independent state based on international resolutions.

The participants agreed on the need to continue these coordinated efforts to ensure that peace initiatives are translated into tangible progress on the ground.

The Istanbul meeting provided an opportunity for participating nations to strengthen cooperation in humanitarian and diplomatic fields.

The ministers discussed strategies to enhance the flow of humanitarian aid to Gaza, especially in areas most affected by conflict, and reiterated their commitment to supporting international agencies and organizations working to deliver essential supplies.

They also emphasized the importance of maintaining open communication channels to prevent further escalation and to safeguard regional stability.

Prince Faisal bin Farhan’s participation reflects Saudi Arabia’s consistent diplomatic engagement in promoting peace and solidarity across the region.

His presence underscored the Kingdom’s active role in international diplomacy, fostering constructive dialogue, and encouraging unity among nations in addressing humanitarian challenges. Saudi Arabia continues to advocate for a fair and comprehensive solution to the Palestinian issue that aligns with the principles of justice, coexistence, and mutual respect.

The meeting concluded with a shared understanding among participating countries to intensify their joint diplomatic efforts, strengthen coordination with international partners, and work toward a permanent cessation of hostilities.

The leaders emphasized the importance of sustained humanitarian access, rebuilding infrastructure in Gaza, and supporting peacebuilding measures that foster hope and resilience among its people.

Through its ongoing diplomatic outreach and humanitarian initiatives, Saudi Arabia remains a key regional player in advancing peace, cooperation, and stability in the Middle East.

The Kingdom’s continued involvement in international discussions like the Istanbul meeting highlights its dedication to fostering global consensus on peace, supporting humanitarian relief, and promoting a future where nations can coexist peacefully through dialogue and shared responsibility.

Speaking on the sidelines of the ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur, he urged the international community to act decisively and responsibly to stop the flow of weapons and external involvement that fuel instability in the war-torn nation.

Guterres highlighted that the Sudanese people have endured immense suffering due to the prolonged violence, which has displaced millions and created one of the world’s most severe humanitarian crises.

He stressed that the priority must now be on promoting dialogue, reconciliation, and humanitarian access rather than escalating military confrontations.

According to him, true peace can only be achieved when Sudan’s future is determined by its own people, free from external pressure or manipulation.

The Secretary-General called on all nations to honor international law and refrain from actions that could worsen the conflict.

He emphasized the need for unity among global and regional powers to promote peace initiatives that respect Sudan’s sovereignty and ensure the protection of civilians.

Guterres reaffirmed the United Nations’ readiness to support negotiations and provide humanitarian assistance to those affected by the fighting.

In his remarks, Guterres also noted that regional cooperation, particularly through organizations like the African Union and neighboring states, is vital to achieving stability.

He urged countries supplying arms to the conflicting parties to halt such activities immediately, warning that continued interference only deepens divisions and prolongs the suffering of innocent civilians.

He expressed appreciation for ongoing diplomatic efforts by African and Middle Eastern nations aimed at facilitating dialogue between the warring sides.

However, he cautioned that these efforts would remain fragile without a unified international stance against external interference and illicit arms transfers.

The Secretary-General reiterated that peace in Sudan is not only crucial for the Sudanese people but also for the broader stability of the African continent.

The conflict’s spillover effects, including refugee flows and border tensions, have affected several neighboring countries, making the need for resolution more urgent than ever.

Guterres reaffirmed that the UN will continue to coordinate with humanitarian agencies and local partners to deliver aid to those in need.

He called on the global community to increase funding and logistical support for relief operations, ensuring that displaced families receive food, shelter, and medical assistance.

His message at the ASEAN Summit resonated as a reminder that global peace and regional cooperation are interconnected.

The Secretary-General emphasized that crises such as Sudan’s cannot be resolved through military means but through collective action, compassion, and diplomacy.

He called on the international community to unite in preventing the further deterioration of the situation and to support efforts that prioritize the dignity and future of the Sudanese people.

By urging restraint, accountability, and cooperation, Guterres once again placed the focus on humanity and justice at the heart of international diplomacy.

His appeal reinforces the UN’s ongoing mission—to stand for peace, safeguard human rights, and help nations rebuild their futures through dialogue, understanding, and shared responsibility.