Taiwan Defence Minister Wellington Koo told parliament that Washington had established a dedicated project team to accelerate stalled programmes and bring deliveries back on schedule.

He said several systems had already begun arriving, while delayed components were being prioritised.A key delay has involved a 2019 order for 66 F-16V fighter jets built by Lockheed Martin, equipped with upgraded avionics and radar to counter advanced aircraft such as China’s Chengdu J-20.

Taiwan’s defence ministry said at the weekend that deliveries of the F-16V jets would begin this year, with production running at full capacity.Washington prioritises TaipeiThe United States has increased its focus on Taiwan within its defence export system.

Michael Miller, director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, said last week he had signed a directive in 2023 placing Taiwan at the top of the priority list for arms transfers.

Koo said Washington’s urgency reflects a shared goal of rapidly enhancing Taiwan’s self-defence capabilities, amid what Taipei views as an escalating military threat from Beijing.

The United States is legally bound to provide Taiwan with defensive means under longstanding legislation, though it maintains no formal diplomatic ties with the island. Arms sales remain a consistent point of friction with China, which claims Taiwan as its territory and has repeatedly demanded that such transfers cease.

Taiwan has in recent years voiced concern over repeated delays in U.S. weapons deliveries, even as it relies on Washington as its principal security partner and supplier of advanced military systems.

Speaking to reporters, Hegseth did not confirm a precise figure but acknowledged the scale of spending, saying “it takes money to kill bad guys” and adding that funding requests to Congress could evolve as the war continues. The campaign, launched on February 28 alongside Israel after failed nuclear negotiations, remains ongoing with no official total cost disclosed.

Pentagon officials have indicated that the first six days of the war alone cost approximately $11.3 billion, according to figures cited to lawmakers. Analysts say that estimate aligns with the intensity of operations conducted during the initial phase.

Daniel Schneiderman, director of global policy programs at Penn Washington, said the scale of deployment including extensive air sorties, precision strikes and naval operations would inevitably result in high costs.

“The amount of precision munitions and interceptors used, the number of air sorties, fuel expended, and cost of operating carrier strike groups all point to a very large bill,” he said.

Much of the expenditure stems from the use of high-end military systems, including cruise missiles, air-dropped bombs and missile defense platforms such as the THAAD. These systems, alongside the logistical infrastructure required to sustain them, represent some of the most expensive elements of modern warfare.

Operational costs also include aircraft maintenance, fuel consumption, and the deployment of carrier strike groups, as well as the personnel required to operate complex systems in sustained combat conditions.

Hegseth indicated that the administration would seek additional funding from Congress to replenish munitions and sustain military readiness, suggesting the conflict could extend beyond initial expectations.

U.S. President Donald Trump also referenced the funding request, describing it as necessary in a “very volatile world” and emphasizing the importance of maintaining large stockpiles of ammunition.

The scale of the proposed funding underscores concerns within Washington about both the duration and intensity of the conflict, as well as broader global security risks.

Beyond direct military spending, the war has triggered wider economic consequences, particularly in global energy markets. Oil prices surged after Iran disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical route for global crude supplies.

The resulting volatility has added indirect costs to the global economy, compounding the financial burden of the war and raising concerns among policymakers about long-term economic stability.

Berlin’s plan to acquire 15 more U.S.-made F-35 fighter jets strengthens NATO readiness and reflects renewed commitment to European security cooperation.

According to a parliamentary source, Defence Minister Boris Pistorius has signaled his intention to move forward with the new purchase, estimated to cost around €2.5 billion ($2.9 billion). The confidential proposal is expected to be reviewed by Germany’s parliamentary budget committee in the coming weeks.

Germany has already ordered 35 F-35 Lightning II jets as part of its earlier decision to replace its fleet of 85 ageing Tornado aircraft, which have been in service since the 1980s.

The Tornado fleet, used primarily for reconnaissance and tactical strike missions, is scheduled for gradual decommissioning over the next decade.

The F-35s will assume one of the Tornado’s most critical roles — carrying U.S. nuclear weapons stored in Germany under NATO’s nuclear-sharing arrangements.

This makes the acquisition a key component of Berlin’s defense modernization strategy and its ongoing commitment to NATO’s collective security obligations.

Expanding Defense Readiness

The move comes as Germany continues to reshape its defense posture following the Russian invasion of Ukraine and rising geopolitical tensions. In 2022, Chancellor Olaf Scholz pledged a €100 billion special defense fund to upgrade Germany’s military infrastructure, equipment, and capabilities — the country’s largest such investment since World War II.

With the expanded order, Germany’s total F-35 fleet will increase to 50 aircraft, positioning the nation among the leading European operators of the advanced stealth fighter.

The F-35, known for its cutting-edge radar evasion technology, advanced sensors, and interoperability within NATO, is expected to become a cornerstone of allied air defense in the coming decades.

“Germany’s additional F-35 order reflects not only a modernization of its air force but also a reaffirmation of its strategic partnership with the United States and its NATO allies,” said a defense analyst in Berlin. “It sends a clear signal of deterrence and readiness.”

Shift in Policy and Regional Implications

Berlin had previously denied plans to purchase more than 35 F-35s as recently as July. However, the improved fiscal position of the defense budget and ongoing discussions about European security priorities appear to have influenced the government’s decision.

The acquisition is also expected to enhance Germany’s defense industry collaborations. However, it could potentially reignite tensions with France over the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) — a joint Franco-German-Spanish project aimed at developing a next-generation European fighter jet.

While the FCAS program has faced repeated delays and technical disagreements, some defense experts argue that the F-35 expansion should not be seen as competition but as a short- to mid-term measure to address immediate defense needs while the FCAS project matures.

“Berlin’s decision to invest in proven, ready-to-deploy F-35s ensures operational security for the next decade while Europe continues to develop its indigenous capabilities,” a European defense official commented.

Strengthening Transatlantic Ties

The F-35 program also deepens transatlantic defense cooperation, with several NATO countries — including Italy, the UK, the Netherlands, Poland, and Finland — already operating or ordering the aircraft. This growing fleet enhances interoperability among allied forces, allowing joint missions and shared maintenance systems.

Lockheed Martin has welcomed Germany’s growing commitment to the F-35 program, emphasizing the aircraft’s role in maintaining air superiority and collective defense readiness.

Once finalized, the new order will underscore Germany’s transformation into a more proactive defense partner within NATO, moving away from its historically restrained military stance.

The additional F-35s are expected to be delivered by the early 2030s, with the first batch of jets from the initial order already in production. Training of German pilots and maintenance crews is underway in the United States.

Defense Minister Pistorius has stated that these measures aim to ensure “operational readiness and strategic flexibility” for the Bundeswehr, Germany’s armed forces, in the face of evolving security threats.

Germany’s expanded F-35 fleet is likely to play a central role in NATO’s future deterrence strategy, reinforcing the alliance’s presence in Europe and ensuring that Germany remains a key contributor to regional and global stability.