Once regarded as a model for universal welfare in South Asia, Sri Lanka is now confronting rising food insecurity, strained public services and widening social vulnerability, prompting renewed calls from economists and rights advocates for a development model centered on universal entitlements rather than austerity-led growth.

For decades, Sri Lanka was recognized for its relatively strong public investments in education, healthcare and food subsidies, which helped establish high social indicators compared with many countries at similar income levels. Universal schooling, accessible healthcare and broad-based welfare programs were often cited as pillars of the country’s post-independence development strategy.

But recent years have seen that framework come under increasing pressure.

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization’s 2025 Hunger Map and the World Food Programme’s 2024 Household Food Security Overview, around one million people in Sri Lanka are now chronically undernourished, while nearly nine million more struggle to access sufficient nutritious food. Nearly four in ten households report inadequate diets, reflecting a sharp deterioration in food security in a country that was once largely self-sufficient in food production and a major seafood exporter.

The figures come against the backdrop of Sri Lanka’s prolonged economic crisis, which intensified after the country’s sovereign debt default in 2022 and triggered inflation, currency depreciation, shortages of essential goods and sweeping fiscal restructuring.

Dr. Ahilan Kadirgamar, a leading Sri Lankan economist and senior lecturer at the University of Jaffna, said the country’s current challenges reflect not only immediate economic distress but a deeper structural shift away from universal welfare protections.

He argues that austerity measures, combined with financialization and infrastructure-heavy development priorities, redirected state resources away from people-centered public services and toward projects that did not adequately protect livelihoods.

“Until recently, Sri Lanka was a country that could sustain itself and export seafood worldwide,” Kadirgamar said. “But now we are facing a situation where millions are unable to access enough nutritious food, and public institutions are under severe strain.

”According to Kadirgamar, hospitals continue to face shortages of essential medicines, universities are functioning under reduced real funding, and welfare programs have become increasingly narrow and targeted rather than universal, leaving large sections of the population exposed during periods of crisis.

He said the transition from universal subsidies toward selective welfare mechanisms has weakened the resilience of ordinary households, particularly during inflationary shocks and employment disruptions.

Kadirgamar has called for what he describes as a “Human Rights Economy,” a framework that places universal access, democratic participation and social protection at the center of economic decision-making.

Rather than treating economic planning as a technical domain reserved for specialists, he argues that citizens must have a direct role in shaping the priorities that affect their livelihoods.

“Economic policies cannot be the realm of experts,” he said. “It must be democratized. It is people’s demands that should determine economic policies.”

The concept of a Human Rights Economy has gained wider attention through advocacy by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, which frames economic governance through the lens of rights protection, equality and public accountability. The approach emphasizes that economic growth alone is insufficient if it does not translate into dignity, food security, healthcare access and social participation.

Kadirgamar said such a shift requires not only policy reform but also organized civic action.“Change will not come without action,” he said. “There needs to be coalitions organizing at every level.”He pointed to cooperatives as one practical mechanism for rebuilding resilience.

Small, democratic and community-based institutions, he said, can help reconnect producers and consumers while reducing dependence on fragile centralized supply chains and volatile global markets.In Sri Lanka, cooperative structures historically played an important role in rural development and agricultural distribution, though many weakened over time amid market liberalization and institutional decline.

Reviving such models, Kadirgamar said, could support local production while strengthening accountability and participation.“To rebuild the economy, citizens and policymakers must rethink how economic policies are made and form coalitions demanding equality, participation and universal rights,” he said.

He views the Human Rights Economy not simply as a new policy language but as a fundamental departure from the trajectory of recent decades.“That’s the context in which I understand the idea of a human rights economy,” he said. “A new framework, but one that has to completely shift from the path we have been on.”

Sri Lanka’s experience is increasingly cited in international discussions about debt, austerity and social rights, particularly as many developing economies face pressure to implement fiscal consolidation measures while managing inflation, debt servicing and weakened welfare systems.

Critics of austerity argue that reducing spending on health, education and food protection during economic recovery often deepens long-term inequality and undermines social stability, even when such measures are framed as necessary for macroeconomic reform.

Supporters of fiscal restructuring, however, argue that restoring financial credibility is essential for long-term recovery and investor confidence, especially after sovereign default.The tension between these approaches has become central to Sri Lanka’s policy debate.

The issue is also being examined through the United Nations-backed podcast series “Economies That Work for All,” produced by UN Human Rights and the UN System Staff College’s Knowledge Centre for Sustainable Development.

The series explores how human rights principles can be integrated into economic systems to support progress toward the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk has also spoken publicly about the need for rights-based economic models, particularly in countries facing sovereign debt burdens and widening inequality.

For Sri Lanka, the debate is no longer theoretical. With millions facing nutritional insecurity and public institutions under visible pressure, the question of whether recovery should be measured by fiscal balance sheets or by human well-being is becoming increasingly urgent.

What emerges from that choice may shape not only the country’s economic future, but the social contract that defines it.

South Africa is advancing a transition away from its coal-dependent economy through a policy framework that seeks to align climate goals with social equity, according to discussions featured in a United Nations-backed podcast examining human rights-based economic models.

The initiative, highlighted in an episode of the “Economies That Work for All” series produced by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN System Staff College, outlines how Africa’s most industrialized economy is attempting to balance decarbonization with the protection of vulnerable communities.

Dorah Modise, Executive Director of South Africa’s Presidential Climate Commission, said the transition to a low-carbon economy is not solely an environmental objective but a broader socio-economic challenge. The country remains one of the most unequal in the world, with coal-dependent regions particularly exposed to potential job losses and economic disruption as energy systems shift.

Modise emphasized that the transition must proceed but warned that its design will determine whether it mitigates or deepens existing inequalities. Communities reliant on coal production face heightened risks, particularly in a context where millions of South Africans continue to experience energy poverty and where financing constraints slow the pace of reform.

The government’s approach is guided by the Just Transition Framework developed by the Presidential Climate Commission, which seeks to integrate economic restructuring with social protection. The framework promotes the gradual decentralization of the energy system, expansion of renewable energy capacity, and the development of new employment pathways in emerging green industries.

Efforts are also underway to prepare workers for shifts in the labor market through retraining and skills development initiatives. Authorities are expanding social protection measures to cushion the impact of industrial restructuring, while also seeking to ensure that the benefits of the energy transition are more evenly distributed.

A key component of the strategy involves the management of natural resources critical to the global energy transition. South Africa holds reserves of minerals required for renewable technologies, and policymakers are attempting to position the country as a supplier while adhering to environmental and labor standards.

“As we explore and extract … we need to protect workers and communities, and we need to avoid impacting the environment,” Modise said, underscoring the importance of responsible mining practices within the broader transition strategy.

The framework is rooted in South Africa’s constitutional provisions, which recognize sustainable development as a fundamental right. This legal foundation shapes the government’s emphasis on integrating human rights considerations into economic planning and environmental policy.Implementation of the transition strategy involves coordination across multiple stakeholders, including government agencies, private sector actors, civil society organizations, and international donors.

This multi-stakeholder approach is intended to address competing interests and manage trade-offs inherent in large-scale economic transformation.The policy framework also incorporates metrics that extend beyond traditional energy indicators. Progress is being assessed not only in terms of renewable energy capacity but also through social outcomes such as reductions in inequality, increased employment opportunities for young people, and greater participation of women in decision-making processes.

Modise described the ultimate measure of success as a narrowing of disparities between different socio-economic groups. This reflects a broader shift in policy thinking that links climate action with inclusive development objectives.South Africa’s transition efforts take place within a wider global debate on how to reconcile decarbonization with economic justice, particularly in developing economies where structural inequalities and fiscal constraints complicate policy implementation.

The country’s approach is being closely observed as a potential model for integrating human rights considerations into climate policy.The podcast series situates South Africa’s experience within the broader concept of a “human rights economy,” which seeks to align economic systems with social and environmental priorities.

The framework is linked to the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which emphasizes inclusive growth and equitable resource distribution.As countries accelerate efforts to meet climate targets, the South African case highlights the challenges of ensuring that transitions away from fossil fuels do not disproportionately affect already marginalized populations.

The emphasis on participatory governance and rights-based policy design reflects an attempt to address these concerns while maintaining momentum toward decarbonization.

India’s rapid expansion of digital payment infrastructure is transforming the country’s informal economy, reshaping how small businesses operate and how individuals access financial services.

Driven by government-backed platforms and widespread smartphone adoption, the shift toward cashless transactions is accelerating financial inclusion while also introducing new regulatory and operational challenges.

At the center of this transformation is the National Payments Corporation of India, which operates the Unified Payments Interface (UPI), a real-time payment system that has seen exponential growth in recent years. UPI allows users to transfer money instantly between bank accounts using mobile applications, eliminating the need for traditional banking intermediaries.

According to official data released by NPCI, monthly UPI transactions have surged into billions, reflecting widespread adoption across urban and rural areas. Small vendors, street hawkers, and local service providers traditionally reliant on cash are increasingly accepting digital payments through QR codes and mobile apps.

The shift has been particularly significant in the informal sector, which accounts for a substantial portion of India’s workforce. Digital payments are enabling businesses to maintain transaction records, access credit, and integrate into formal financial systems.

This transition is seen by policymakers as a step toward improving tax compliance and economic transparency.The Reserve Bank of India has played a key role in regulating and promoting digital payment systems.

Through policy measures aimed at enhancing security and interoperability, the central bank has sought to build trust among users while encouraging innovation within the fintech sector.Private technology companies have also been instrumental in driving adoption.

Platforms such as PhonePe and Google Pay have expanded their user base by offering simplified interfaces and incentives for digital transactions. These applications have effectively bridged the gap between banking infrastructure and everyday users.Despite the progress, challenges remain.

Cybersecurity concerns are growing as transaction volumes increase, with reports of fraud and data breaches highlighting vulnerabilities within the system. Regulators have responded by introducing stricter authentication protocols and awareness campaigns to educate users about safe practices.

Another concern is digital literacy. While smartphone penetration has increased significantly, a segment of the population remains unfamiliar with digital financial tools. This gap is particularly evident among older populations and in regions with limited internet connectivity.

Addressing this issue is critical to ensuring that the benefits of digital payments are distributed evenly.The expansion of digital payments is also influencing consumer behavior. With instant payment capabilities, spending patterns are becoming more fluid, and businesses are adapting by offering digital-only discounts and services.

Analysts note that this shift is contributing to the growth of e-commerce and online service platforms.From a macroeconomic perspective, the move toward digital transactions is expected to enhance efficiency and reduce the costs associated with cash handling.

It also provides policymakers with better data for economic analysis, enabling more informed decision-making.However, the transition raises questions about data privacy and market concentration.

As large technology firms play an increasingly central role in financial transactions, concerns have emerged regarding data ownership and competitive practices. Regulators are closely monitoring these developments to ensure a balanced ecosystem.

The government has continued to promote digital payments through initiatives aligned with its broader digital economy strategy. These efforts include expanding internet infrastructure, incentivizing adoption, and integrating digital systems into public services.

Experts caution that while digital payments offer clear advantages, they should complement rather than entirely replace cash systems, particularly in regions where infrastructure remains uneven. A hybrid approach is seen as more practical in the near term.

India’s experience is being closely observed by other developing economies seeking to replicate its model of rapid digital financial inclusion. The combination of government support, private sector innovation, and user adoption has created a framework that could inform similar initiatives globally.

As digital payments become embedded in everyday life, their impact on the informal economy, financial systems, and regulatory landscape is expected to deepen.

The challenge for policymakers will be to sustain growth while addressing emerging risks and ensuring that the transition remains inclusive.

All 495 lawmakers present endorsed his nomination, according to parliament, formalizing a dual leadership structure that departs from Vietnam’s long-standing system of collective governance.

Lam, who secured a second term earlier this year as head of the Communist Party of Vietnam, now holds both the top party and state positions for the next five years. Analysts say the concentration of authority could streamline policymaking but also raises concerns about increased centralization of power.

In a televised address after the vote, Lam pledged to pursue a new growth strategy driven by science, technology, innovation and digital transformation, while emphasizing stability, self-reliance in defense and improvements in living standards.

The leadership shift marks a structural change in Vietnam’s political system, bringing it closer to models seen in other one-party states where power is concentrated in a single figure.

Observers say this could accelerate economic decision-making in the fast-growing Southeast Asian economy.Lam, 68, previously served as minister of public security and has promoted reforms aimed at boosting competitiveness and reducing reliance on low-cost manufacturing.

His policies have drawn both praise from investors and concerns over potential risks such as market distortions, favouritism and asset bubbles.Vietnam’s foreign policy is expected to remain broadly unchanged, with Lam continuing a balancing approach between major powers while expanding global partnerships.

The National Assembly is expected to appoint a new prime minister later on Tuesday to replace Pham Minh Chinh.

Speaking at the annual China Development Forum in Beijing, Li said China would expand imports of high-quality foreign goods and work with trading partners to promote more balanced global trade, according to state media.

Li’s remarks come as China faces mounting concerns from major economies, particularly the United States and the European Union, over its trade practices, industrial overcapacity and reliance on Chinese exports.

While he did not directly reference the record surplus, his comments indicated an effort to address imbalances that have strained international economic relations.The forum, which brings together foreign business leaders, policymakers and economists, is a key platform for Beijing to outline its economic priorities and signal openness to global investors.

In a separate address, central bank governor Pan Gongsheng said assessments of global imbalances should account for both goods and services trade, as well as financial flows. He noted that while China runs the world’s largest goods surplus, it also posts the largest services deficit.

Pan added that China does not intend to gain a competitive trade advantage through currency depreciation, responding to longstanding concerns from trading partners over exchange rate policies.

Beijing is also attempting to reverse a decline in foreign direct investment, which fell 5.7% year-on-year to just over 92 billion yuan ($13.36 billion) in January, following a 9.5% drop in 2025.

In December, authorities expanded incentives for foreign investors by adding 200 sectors eligible for benefits such as tax breaks and preferential land use, focusing on areas including advanced manufacturing and modern services.

Efforts to stabilise trade ties come as geopolitical tensions persist. U.S. President Donald Trump recently postponed a planned visit to Beijing to meet President Xi Jinping due to the Iran conflict, delaying talks aimed at easing economic tensions between the two countries.

The forum, held under the theme “A Spirit of Dialogue,” provides a strategic platform for Saudi Arabia to share its Vision 2030 experience while reinforcing partnerships that address shared global challenges in an increasingly interconnected world.

Prince Faisal emphasized that long-term prosperity cannot be achieved by governments acting alone, stressing that meaningful collaboration between the public and private sectors is essential for sustainable growth, resilience, and innovation.

He noted that Saudi Arabia views the World Economic Forum as a vital space for exchanging ideas on economic transformation, environmental responsibility, technological advancement, and human development, all of which are core pillars of the Kingdom’s national vision and reform agenda.

The Saudi delegation includes senior officials responsible for finance, investment, economy and planning, commerce, tourism, industry and mineral resources, as well as communications and information technology, reflecting the breadth of the Kingdom’s reform efforts.

Their participation in bilateral meetings and public sessions is aimed at deepening cooperation with international partners, attracting investment, and showcasing Saudi Arabia’s progress in diversifying its economy beyond oil while strengthening institutional capacity and competitiveness.

Prince Faisal highlighted that Saudi Arabia continues to develop new business models and policy frameworks that encourage innovation, enhance productivity, and create high-quality investment opportunities aligned with global trends.

He added that the Davos forum enables constructive engagement with governments, business leaders, and civil society representatives on pressing issues such as global economic uncertainty, climate challenges, digital transformation, and inclusive growth, all of which require collective action and shared responsibility.

Saudi House will also return to Davos in 2026 after its successful debut, hosting more than 20 focused sessions on investment, human capability development, quality of life, and global collaboration.

These sessions are designed to present Saudi perspectives, facilitate dialogue, and build bridges between international stakeholders, reinforcing the Kingdom’s image as an active contributor to global solutions rather than a passive participant.

The 56th World Economic Forum annual meeting is expected to attract around 3,000 participants from nearly 130 countries, including heads of state, government officials, CEOs, and thought leaders.

Saudi Arabia’s strong presence at the forum reflects its confidence in its reform trajectory and its willingness to engage openly with the world to promote stability, shared prosperity, and sustainable development through dialogue and cooperation.

The demonstrations, driven largely by rising prices and currency pressures, reflect deep economic anxieties among ordinary citizens who are calling for relief, accountability, and improved living standards.

U.S. President Donald Trump issued a warning cautioning against the use of force on demonstrators, framing his remarks as support for civilian safety and the principle of protecting lives during periods of unrest.

While his language was forceful, the message underscored global concern about avoiding bloodshed and encouraging restraint as tensions rise during a sensitive domestic moment for Iran.

Iranian officials rejected any suggestion of foreign interference, emphasizing sovereignty and warning that external pressure could widen regional instability if not carefully managed.

At the same time, authorities within Iran signaled firmness toward unlawful violence, while also acknowledging the seriousness of economic grievances expressed by segments of the population.

Reports from various provinces indicate that protests have spread beyond isolated areas, highlighting the nationwide impact of inflation and currency depreciation on households and small businesses.

Despite clashes reported in some locations, officials stressed the importance of restoring calm and preventing escalation while investigations continue into incidents that resulted in loss of life.

Human rights groups and local media have cited multiple fatalities and arrests, drawing international attention and prompting renewed calls for transparency and accountability.

Medical services and emergency responders have remained active in affected areas, reflecting efforts to manage the situation and protect public safety amid heightened tensions.

Iran’s leadership has a long history of navigating internal unrest, and analysts note that experience, combined with reform efforts, could shape how the current situation evolves.

President Masoud Pezeshkian has adopted a notably conciliatory tone, publicly acknowledging that economic mismanagement and governance gaps have contributed to public dissatisfaction.

His remarks emphasizing responsibility and dialogue were widely seen as an effort to rebuild trust and open channels of communication with concerned citizens.

The government’s economic reform agenda, including attempts to liberalize certain markets, aims to address long-term structural challenges, even as short-term impacts have proven difficult.

A sharp decline in the rial has intensified inflationary pressures, affecting food prices, housing costs, and basic services, and amplifying frustration among working families.

International observers note that economic recovery will require a combination of domestic reforms and eased external pressures to stabilize markets and restore confidence.

U.S. sanctions remain a central factor shaping Iran’s economic environment, with their impact felt across trade, investment, and currency stability.

Regional dynamics also influence the situation, as Iran’s relationships with neighboring countries and allied groups continue to shape broader Middle Eastern geopolitics.

Despite sharp rhetoric, diplomatic channels remain active, and many global actors continue to stress the value of dialogue over confrontation in resolving disputes.

Analysts suggest that measured responses, economic relief efforts, and inclusive policymaking could help de-escalate tensions and support long-term stability.

As events continue to unfold, the focus for many inside and outside Iran remains on protecting lives, addressing economic hardship, and encouraging peaceful solutions.

The current moment is widely viewed as a test of leadership, resilience, and the ability of institutions to respond constructively to public concerns.

Amid uncertainty, there is cautious optimism that acknowledgment of internal challenges and international engagement can open space for reform and recovery.

The report confirms that Ukraine is confidently advancing toward full European Union membership, marking a historic step in the nation’s integration into the European family.

In his remarks, President Zelenskiy emphasized that the findings demonstrate Ukraine’s strong and steady movement toward meeting EU standards.

He said the country is ready to open the first three negotiation clusters, a key step in the formal accession process, reflecting Ukraine’s dedication to governance, transparency, and democratic values.

The president underscored that this achievement is not just a milestone for Ukraine but a victory for the entire European community.

He called on the EU to take decisive action to remove artificial barriers that stand in the way of progress, urging for unity and mutual support in building a stronger, more resilient Europe.

European leaders, including European Council President Antonio Costa, European Commission Vice-President Kaja Kallas, and EU

Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos, met with Zelenskiy in Kyiv to reaffirm the EU’s continued commitment to Ukraine.
Their meeting symbolized solidarity, partnership, and the shared belief that Ukraine’s future lies firmly within the European Union.

Zelenskiy praised the European Commission for recognizing Ukraine’s reforms, which include progress in anti-corruption measures, judicial independence, and economic modernization.

He noted that despite the ongoing challenges posed by Russia’s invasion, Ukraine has not deviated from its reform agenda or its vision of democratic governance.

The European Union has consistently acknowledged Ukraine’s courage and resilience under extraordinary circumstances.

By pushing forward with reforms in the middle of conflict, Ukraine has demonstrated the strength and unity of its people, inspiring admiration and respect across the continent.

According to political analysts, the latest EU report reinforces Ukraine’s credibility as a candidate country. It confirms that the country has met key benchmarks in the rule of law, economic stability, and institutional transparency — essential pillars for EU membership.

This steady progress reflects a nation determined to transform itself and contribute meaningfully to Europe’s collective future.

For many Ukrainians, the European dream represents more than political alignment — it is a symbol of freedom, opportunity, and long-term peace.

Citizens across the country have embraced the vision of a modern, democratic Ukraine deeply integrated with its European partners.
Public support for EU membership remains strong, reflecting national unity in the face of adversity.

European officials have also commended Ukraine’s progress in aligning its legislation with EU standards. From environmental protection to digital transformation, Ukraine continues to implement reforms that enhance its competitiveness and resilience.

These steps ensure that the country is well-prepared to contribute to Europe’s innovation-driven and sustainable future.

Zelenskiy’s message of confidence and determination has resonated across the continent. He reaffirmed that Ukraine’s European path is not just a political ambition but a moral commitment to uphold the principles of democracy, justice, and human rights.

His words echo the aspirations of millions who believe in a united and prosperous Europe.

The EU’s encouragement and recognition have provided a new wave of motivation for Ukrainian institutions and civil society.

Together, they are working to accelerate reform, strengthen institutions, and build partnerships that reflect shared values and mutual trust. The process may be long, but the direction is clear — Ukraine is on a path of transformation and progress.

As Zelenskiy stated, Ukraine’s future is European, and its progress represents hope for a stronger, more integrated continent. The European Commission’s report serves as a beacon of encouragement for nations striving toward reform, unity, and shared prosperity.

In every step forward, Ukraine continues to prove that determination, courage, and faith in democratic values can shape the future of Europe.