Speaking during an official visit to Vilnius, Volodymyr Zelenskiy said Ukraine is now waiting only for confirmation from its partners on the date and venue for signing the agreement.

According to Zelenskiy, the proposed guarantees place the United States at the centre of Ukraine’s future security framework, reflecting Kyiv’s belief that American backing is essential for long-term stability.

He added that once the document is signed, it will move to the next stage of democratic approval through ratification in both the US Congress and the Ukrainian parliament.

The announcement follows a fresh round of diplomatic engagement aimed at exploring pathways to end the nearly four-year conflict between Ukraine and Russia.

Over the weekend, negotiators from Ukraine and Russia met in Abu Dhabi alongside US mediators for the first trilateral talks of this kind, though no final agreement was reached.

Despite the lack of a breakthrough, officials from both Moscow and Kyiv signalled a willingness to continue discussions, suggesting that diplomatic momentum has not entirely stalled.

Zelenskiy described the talks as difficult but noted that the number of contentious issues under discussion has decreased compared to earlier stages.

Central to the negotiations is a US-backed framework reportedly containing around 20 points, designed to outline possible steps toward de-escalation and a political settlement.

While many of these points remain sensitive, Zelenskiy indicated that progress has been made in narrowing disagreements, even if core differences persist.

One of the most divisive issues continues to be territorial control in eastern Ukraine, where fighting has raged since the start of the full-scale invasion.

Zelenskiy said Russia is pressing Ukraine to abandon claims over regions it has failed to fully occupy, a demand Kyiv has firmly rejected.

Ukraine’s position, he stressed, remains unchanged, with territorial integrity seen as non-negotiable under international law.

Any proposal that compromises Ukraine’s sovereignty, Zelenskiy said, would be unacceptable to both the government and the Ukrainian public.

The Ukrainian leader acknowledged that compromise is a necessary part of diplomacy but argued that it cannot come at the cost of fundamental national principles.

He added that mediators, including the United States, face the difficult task of bridging two fundamentally different positions held by Kyiv and Moscow.

If signed, the US security guarantees document could reshape Ukraine’s defence posture and its relationship with Western allies.

Analysts say such guarantees may deter future aggression by clarifying the extent of international support Ukraine would receive in the event of renewed conflict.

Zelenskiy’s remarks in Vilnius also highlighted the importance of continued European engagement, as Ukraine works closely with regional partners such as Lithuania and Poland.

These alliances, he said, reinforce Ukraine’s diplomatic standing and underline the broader regional stakes involved in ending the war.

While uncertainty remains over the timing and outcome of further talks, Kyiv appears eager to maintain diplomatic pressure while strengthening its security arrangements.

For Ukraine, the completion of the US guarantees document represents not an end to the conflict, but a potential foundation for a more secure future.

The renewed diplomatic outreach comes as Kyiv faces growing pressure to accelerate peace efforts while safeguarding national sovereignty and securing guarantees against future aggression.

Zelenskiy has indicated that direct talks with Trump are essential to assess Washington’s willingness to back Ukraine with firm security commitments extending beyond a temporary ceasefire.

Ukrainian officials say such guarantees are critical to prevent Russia from regrouping and launching renewed military action once hostilities are paused.

At the center of the talks are disputes over territory in eastern Ukraine and control of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, Europe’s largest such facility.

Kyiv remains firmly opposed to Russian demands that it cede parts of the Donetsk region, which has endured prolonged fighting and heavy destruction.

Although Russian forces occupy significant areas, Ukraine continues to hold key sections and views withdrawal as politically and strategically unacceptable.

The future of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant has also emerged as a major sticking point, given its importance to Ukraine’s energy security and regional safety.

Zelenskiy has stressed that any agreement involving strategic assets or territory must include strong enforcement mechanisms and international oversight.

Speaking to journalists, he emphasized that diplomatic progress depends heavily on sustained pressure from the United States on Moscow.

According to Zelenskiy, Washington possesses significant economic and political leverage that could shift Russia’s calculus if used decisively.

He has pointed to recent US actions elsewhere as evidence that firm pressure can alter entrenched political behavior.

Despite diplomatic activity, Russian forces continue air strikes against Ukrainian cities and energy infrastructure, complicating efforts to build trust around negotiations.

Zelenskiy argues that ongoing attacks undermine confidence in Russia’s commitment to any ceasefire arrangement.

In recent talks held in Paris, Ukraine’s allies expressed readiness to support a ceasefire through measures such as a multinational troop presence.

However, Kyiv has noted that many of these assurances remain political statements rather than legally binding commitments approved by national legislatures.

Ukrainian officials are seeking guarantees that would last more than 15 years, reflecting lessons learned from previous security arrangements that failed to deter aggression.

US and Ukrainian negotiators have revisited proposals related to territorial administration, including unconventional ideas aimed at breaking the impasse.

One such concept reportedly involves creating special economic arrangements in contested regions, though no formal agreement has been reached.

Zelenskiy has reiterated that any compromise on land must ultimately be decided by the Ukrainian people through a national referendum.

Public opinion surveys suggest that while many Ukrainians are open to freezing current front lines, there is strong resistance to formally surrendering territory.

This sentiment reflects the deep emotional and political cost of land concessions after years of conflict and civilian suffering.

The White House has not publicly commented on the prospect of a new meeting between Trump and Zelenskiy, leaving Kyiv awaiting clarity.

European partners continue to play a supportive role, but Ukraine views US leadership as indispensable to any durable settlement.

As negotiations proceed, the challenge lies in balancing urgency for peace with the need for credible safeguards that ensure Ukraine’s long-term independence.

Zelenskiy has framed the talks as not only about ending the current war but about shaping the security architecture of Eastern Europe for decades.

The coming weeks are expected to be decisive as negotiators test whether compromise is possible without undermining Ukraine’s core interests.

President Volodymyr Zelenskiy emphasized that Ukraine’s primary goal remains lasting peace and protection against future aggression. Ahead of talks with U.S. envoys and European allies, Zelenskiy indicated that Kyiv is open to alternatives to NATO membership.

This shift reflects a pragmatic approach aimed at ending the conflict while ensuring Ukraine’s sovereignty and safety. Ukraine’s leadership stressed that security guarantees from trusted partners could provide effective protection.

These guarantees would involve commitments from the United States, key European countries, and other allies. Zelenskiy described such arrangements as a serious compromise undertaken in the interest of peace.

He underlined that any guarantees must be strong, credible, and legally binding to prevent future attacks. For years, NATO membership was seen by Ukraine as the most reliable shield against renewed conflict.

However, geopolitical realities and differing views among allies have shaped a more flexible pathway. Ukrainian officials framed the decision as a strategic adjustment rather than a retreat from national interests.

They emphasized that security assurances similar in strength to collective defense principles remain essential. The talks in Berlin come at a critical moment in the nearly four-year-long conflict.

European and U.S. partners are working closely with Kyiv to refine peace proposals. These discussions aim to balance realism with Ukraine’s core demands for independence and safety.

Zelenskiy reiterated that Ukraine is seeking a dignified peace that respects international law. He stressed that peace must ensure stability not only for Ukraine but for the wider region.

The proposed framework includes the possibility of a ceasefire along current front lines. Such a step is seen as a foundation for broader political and security arrangements.

Ukrainian officials have made clear that they are not engaging in direct talks with Russia at this stage. Instead, negotiations are being conducted through diplomatic channels with allied partners.

The presence of senior U.S. envoys at the talks has been interpreted as a sign of renewed momentum. Washington’s engagement underscores the importance of coordinated international efforts.

European leaders have also reaffirmed their support for Ukraine during this sensitive phase. Germany is hosting a summit that brings together key European partners and Ukrainian leadership.

The gathering reflects continued solidarity with Ukraine amid ongoing challenges. Despite diplomatic efforts, the humanitarian situation remains difficult.

Recent attacks have caused widespread damage to energy and water infrastructure. Large numbers of civilians continue to face power shortages during harsh conditions.

Ukrainian authorities say these attacks reinforce the urgency of achieving a reliable peace. Zelenskiy accused Russia of prolonging the conflict through continued strikes on civilian areas.He called on allies to maintain pressure and unity during negotiations.

European governments view the talks as potentially shaping Ukraine’s future security architecture They are also exploring financial mechanisms to support Ukraine’s economy and reconstruction.

Frozen assets and international assistance are part of ongoing discussions. NATO leaders have warned of broader security implications for Europe.

At the same time, Ukraine’s leadership has focused on immediate national priorities. The emphasis remains on protecting citizens and preserving territorial integrity.

Zelenskiy’s approach highlights diplomacy as a tool alongside resilience. Observers see the move as an effort to keep peace talks constructive.

Ukraine’s willingness to explore alternatives reflects confidence in international partnerships. The leadership believes strong guarantees can deter future aggression.

This moment is widely seen as a test of global commitment to peace and stability. Ukraine’s message is clear: peace must be durable, fair, and secure.

As talks continue, the focus remains on preventing future conflict. The outcome could redefine security cooperation in Europe.

Ukraine’s flexibility aims to open the door to a sustainable resolution.