Sources familiar with the matter say preparations are underway, with timelines depending on conditions that allow participation across different areas.

The planned elections are expected to take place during the early months of 2026.

The process is described as an internal mechanism intended to ensure continuity in leadership and administrative coordination.

According to people close to the discussions, organisational committees are reviewing logistical arrangements.

These preparations are focused on enabling participation where circumstances permit and ensuring internal procedures are followed.

The leadership renewal is expected to include the formation of a new consultative council.\

This body traditionally plays a role in advising on policy direction and organisational matters.

Members of this council are usually selected through internal voting conducted every four years.

Representation is drawn from different branches associated with the movement’s organisational structure.

The consultative council is responsible for choosing members of the political leadership body.

It also selects the head of that body, who serves as the overall leader of the organisation.

Sources indicate that the election process may be staggered due to practical challenges.

Timing decisions are expected to prioritise feasibility and internal coordination.

Individuals familiar with earlier elections said participation previously took place at multiple local venues.

This approach allowed members to vote while maintaining organisational protocols.

Some figures within the movement are viewed as potential candidates due to experience and internal relationships.

Their roles have included engagement with various Palestinian political actors over time.

The renewal process is also seen as a step toward internal stability.

Supporters of the process say it helps maintain structured decision-making during periods of change.

Humanitarian conditions in Gaza remain a major concern alongside these organisational developments.

Sources stress that internal political processes are being considered with sensitivity to civilian circumstances.

The elections are described as internal and not linked to external political timelines.

Decisions on leadership are expected to remain within the organisation’s established framework.

Observers note that leadership renewal cycles have historically followed defined procedures.’

These processes are intended to ensure representation from different organisational segments.

Internal discussions reportedly emphasise consultation and consensus-building.

This reflects longstanding practices within the group’s organisational culture.

While exact dates are not finalised, preparations are ongoing.

Sources say announcements will be made when arrangements are completed.

The process is viewed by insiders as part of long-term organisational planning.

It aims to maintain continuity while adapting to changing conditions.

No changes to external policy positions have been linked to the election process.

The focus remains on internal governance and administrative structure.

The coming months are expected to involve further consultations.

These will help determine how and when the elections proceed.

Overall, the leadership elections represent an internal organisational milestone.

They are intended to support continuity and structured decision-making.