Environmental degradation and systemic inequality are leaving billions of people without access to safe drinking water and sanitation, according to a United Nations policy brief that underscores the growing intersection between climate pressures, public health risks, and human rights obligations.

The brief, prepared by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on behalf of UN-Water, estimates that around 2.1 billion people globally lack access to safely managed drinking water, while 3.4 billion do not have access to safely managed sanitation services.

The findings are intended to guide policymakers and government authorities in designing laws and strategies that address water scarcity and environmental stress through a human rights-based framework.Under international human rights law, states are required to ensure that water and sanitation services are available, accessible, affordable, acceptable, and of adequate quality.

These obligations are central to maintaining public health, supporting livelihoods, and ensuring a basic standard of dignity.Despite these commitments, the report highlights persistent and widespread gaps in service delivery. More than 1,000 children under the age of five die each day from diseases linked to unsafe water, poor sanitation, and inadequate hygiene.

The burden of water access also falls disproportionately on women and girls, who collectively spend an estimated 250 million hours daily collecting water, often under conditions that expose them to physical risk and limit opportunities for education and employment.

The report identifies chronic underinvestment in the water and sanitation sector as a major constraint, noting that funding levels remain insufficient relative to the scale of the challenge. This underinvestment comes despite the sector’s critical role in climate resilience, economic development, and disease prevention.

According to the brief, environmental degradation is compounding existing inequalities and disproportionately affecting marginalized populations. Groups identified as particularly vulnerable include women and girls, children, older persons, persons with disabilities, Indigenous communities, people living in poverty, and those displaced by conflict or environmental stress.

“For many, the denial of access to safe drinking water and sanitation is a result, not of scarcity alone, but of exclusion and inaccessibility woven into institutions and infrastructure,” the report states, highlighting structural barriers that limit equitable access.The document also draws attention to emerging and conflict-related threats to water security.

It notes that water infrastructure has increasingly been targeted in armed conflicts, in violation of international humanitarian law. In Gaza, the destruction of desalination facilities and damage to water systems has forced civilians to rely on contaminated supplies. In Sudan, attacks on water and electricity infrastructure have disrupted access for millions, while in Yemen, sanitation facilities supported by international organizations have been struck by airstrikes.

In addition to conflict-related risks, the brief identifies new pressures linked to technological and industrial expansion. The rapid growth of data centres, for example, is emerging as a significant but often overlooked source of water consumption. A single one-megawatt data centre can require more than 25 million litres of water annually for cooling, an amount roughly equivalent to the daily consumption needs of 300,000 people.

Amid these challenges, the report outlines examples of policy interventions that integrate human rights principles into water governance. Case studies from multiple countries illustrate how targeted reforms can improve access, affordability, and sustainability.In Bangladesh, a community-led initiative enabled residents in coastal areas to co-finance a climate-resilient water facility, with women trained to manage operations.

The program contributed to a reduction in waterborne diseases and improved school attendance among girls, and has since been replicated across hundreds of administrative wards.In Costa Rica, a water tariff reform introduced progressive pricing, charging higher rates for heavy users while offering subsidized rates for low-income households. The approach improved affordability for vulnerable populations while encouraging conservation, demonstrating how economic regulation can align with human rights objectives.

The brief emphasizes that such initiatives are most effective when supported by strong governance frameworks. It calls for greater transparency, public participation, and access to information, alongside legal mechanisms that allow individuals to seek redress when rights are violated.States are also urged to integrate water and sanitation priorities into broader policy frameworks, including climate adaptation plans, biodiversity strategies, and disaster risk reduction efforts.

The report highlights the need for financing models that are predictable, accessible, and aligned with human rights standards, as well as the importance of strengthening local governance capacities.Gender considerations are identified as a critical component of effective policy design.

The report calls for measures to address structural inequalities, including gender-responsive budgeting, increased representation of women in decision-making, and protections against gender-based violence linked to water access.The role of the private sector is also addressed, with the report referencing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Companies are expected to conduct due diligence, disclose environmental and social impacts, and provide remedies where harm occurs.

Governments, in turn, are tasked with regulating corporate activity to prevent abuses affecting water and sanitation systems.UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk said that addressing water and sanitation challenges requires sustained political and financial commitment. “Investment in water is an investment in dignity, equality, public health, and sustainable development,” he said in a statement marking World Water Day 2026.

The findings highlight the scale and complexity of the global water crisis, with environmental degradation, population pressures, and governance gaps continuing to strain already fragile systems.

In Delhi, official data and field reports indicate that domestic violence remains a persistent feature of urban life, cutting across income groups and educational backgrounds.

According to the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019–21), approximately 29% of ever-married women in India have experienced spousal violence at some point, with urban prevalence slightly lower than rural figures but still significant in absolute numbers due to population density.

Police records from the National Crime Records Bureau show that cases registered under “cruelty by husband or his relatives” consistently account for the largest share of crimes against women. In its latest available annual report, the NCRB documented over 100,000 such cases nationwide, with Delhi among the cities reporting a high volume of complaints relative to its population.

A 34-year-old resident of East Delhi, whose identity is being withheld for legal reasons, described repeated instances of physical and psychological abuse over several years of marriage. Her case was registered under provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, which provides for civil remedies including protection orders, residence rights, and financial relief.

According to court filings reviewed by legal aid groups, delays in enforcement and procedural bottlenecks often limit the effectiveness of these protections.

India’s legal framework addressing domestic violence includes both criminal and civil provisions. Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code criminalizes cruelty by a husband or his relatives, while the Domestic Violence Act of 2005 broadens the scope to include physical, emotional, economic, and sexual abuse.

Despite this, implementation remains uneven.Data from the Delhi Commission for Women indicates that complaint volumes surged during periods of restricted mobility, particularly during pandemic-related lockdowns, when access to support networks was limited.

While complaint numbers have since stabilized, officials say underreporting continues to be a structural issue. Social stigma, economic dependency, and concerns about familial disruption are cited by advocacy groups as key factors discouraging women from seeking formal recourse.

Legal practitioners working with survivors report that interim relief orders, though provided by law, are not always issued in a timely manner. Court backlogs and administrative delays can extend proceedings over months or years.

Shelter homes and protection officers, mandated under the Domestic Violence Act, remain unevenly distributed across districts, limiting access for vulnerable populations.

Research conducted by the International Institute for Population Sciences, which coordinates the NFHS, indicates that domestic violence correlates with a range of socio-economic factors, including household income, educational attainment, and exposure to intergenerational violence.

However, the data also shows that no demographic group is entirely insulated.Urban centers such as Delhi present a complex pattern. Higher literacy rates and greater institutional access contribute to increased reporting relative to rural areas, yet the underlying incidence remains substantial.

NCRB data suggests that metropolitan areas account for a disproportionate share of registered cases, reflecting both higher population density and relatively greater access to law enforcement mechanisms.

A senior official at a Delhi-based women’s helpline, speaking on condition of anonymity, stated that psychological abuse and economic control are frequently underreported compared to physical violence.

This aligns with findings from NFHS-5, which notes that non-physical forms of abuse often go unrecognized within both legal and social frameworks.

Government and civil society responses have focused on expanding reporting mechanisms and support infrastructure. The Delhi government operates dedicated helplines and has increased funding for one-stop crisis centres, which provide medical, legal, and psychological assistance.

These centres are part of a broader national initiative supported by the Ministry of Women and Child Development.At the national level, policy discussions have increasingly emphasized the need for integrated responses that combine legal enforcement with social support systems. Experts argue that addressing domestic violence requires coordination across police, judiciary, healthcare providers, and community organizations.

Data sharing and standardization of reporting practices have also been identified as areas requiring improvement.The economic implications of domestic violence have drawn attention in recent policy debates. Studies by multilateral institutions, including the World Bank, have highlighted the broader impact on workforce participation and productivity.

Women experiencing domestic violence are more likely to face disruptions in employment, contributing to wider economic costs.

Despite these initiatives, enforcement gaps remain a persistent concern. Advocacy groups point to the need for greater accountability in implementing existing laws, rather than introducing new legislative measures.

Training for law enforcement personnel and judicial officers has been identified as a critical factor in improving case outcomes.

In Delhi, the woman whose case is currently under judicial consideration continues to navigate the legal process while residing in temporary accommodation arranged through a local support organization.

Her case reflects patterns documented in official data, where legal remedies exist but their accessibility and timeliness remain inconsistent across jurisdictions.