The resolution, submitted by the British Columbia General Employees’ Union, sought additional scrutiny of products and services provided by Thomson Reuters to law enforcement agencies, including contracts linked to U.S. immigration enforcement.

The proposal was opposed by the board of the Toronto-based content and technology company. Chairman David Thomson told shareholders during the meeting that more than 95% of votes cast were against the measure, while slightly more than 3% supported it.

“We welcome the outcome of today’s vote, which reflects shareholders’ confidence in the board’s recommendation to vote against the proposal,” a company spokesperson said.

The debate focused on concerns raised by some investors and employees that Thomson Reuters products may contribute to the enforcement activities of the administration’s immigration policies targeting undocumented migrants.

Supporters of the resolution pointed to a $22.8 million contract with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that was scheduled to conclude in May. Part of the agreement involved providing license plate reader data to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Federal spending records show the contract, along with other government agreements, was awarded to Thomson Reuters Special Services (TRSS), a Virginia-based subsidiary of Thomson Reuters.

TRSS says its services assist government agencies in combating financial crime, identifying foreign influence operations and supporting law enforcement and national security analysis through data-driven tools.
Thomson Reuters noted that its Reuters news division operates independently and separately from the company’s commercial and government-services businesses.

Corporate governance specialists said the vote indicated that major institutional investors did not view the proposal as necessary or were unwilling to challenge the company’s existing approach to managing risks associated with government contracts.
Douglas Chia, president of governance advisory firm Soundboard Governance, said the result suggested shareholders were not interested in sending a broader political signal regarding the company’s relationship with immigration authorities.

One of Thomson Reuters’ largest shareholders, Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, said it opposed the resolution because it did not identify significant shortcomings in the company’s management or disclosure of sustainability-related risks.
Following the vote, Emma Pullman, head of shareholder engagement at the British Columbia General Employees’ Union, said the company had made progress in certain areas of disclosure but argued that additional reporting on law-enforcement-related products would benefit investors.

Pullman said a dedicated assessment of products used in immigration and policing activities could strengthen transparency and demonstrate the company’s commitment to human rights considerations.
The vote highlights the growing tension facing publicly traded companies that provide technology and data services to government agencies, particularly as investors increasingly weigh environmental, social and governance concerns against commercial opportunities and public-sector contracts.

“They can’t do anything—it’s like they’re kidnapped there. We, their family members, want to help, but it’s not in our hands.”

Relatives of immigrants detained at the Delaney Hall immigration detention facility in New Jersey say they are increasingly concerned about the wellbeing of their loved ones as a hunger and labor strike over alleged conditions inside the center enters its third week, drawing protests, political scrutiny and competing claims from detainees, government officials and the facility’s private operator.

At the center of those concerns is Elder Guerra, a Guatemalan immigrant who has been held at Delaney Hall for nearly five months while contesting his deportation case. According to a family member who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation, Guerra suffered a serious fall in mid-May while showering inside the facility.

The relative said Guerra slipped, struck the back of his head and lost consciousness before experiencing a seizure. Other detainees reportedly urged guards to seek emergency medical assistance before Guerra was transported to a hospital.

He was later returned to Delaney Hall and placed in a medical isolation unit.Nearly three weeks after the incident, the relative said Guerra continues to experience severe headaches, dizziness, sensitivity to light, fatigue and hearing problems in one ear.”He needs medical attention.

He’s not in an adequate place to recover,” the relative said.The case has become one of several cited by detainees, advocates and family members who accuse authorities and facility operators of failing to provide adequate medical care and humane living conditions at Delaney Hall, a detention center operated by the private prison company GEO Group under contract with federal immigration authorities.

The facility has become the focus of mounting controversy since detainees launched a hunger and labor strike on May 22. Participants say the action was prompted by concerns over medical treatment, food quality, sanitation, drinking water and living conditions.

According to a letter released by detainees on May 31, those held inside the facility described what they called conditions “not fit for human beings over such a long period of time.”The letter alleged medical neglect, contaminated drinking water, expired food, unusable bathrooms and poorly maintained ventilation systems that detainees claim have contributed to frequent illness.

The detainees also demanded faster processing of immigration cases, the release of elderly and sick detainees, a meeting with New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill and an end to what they described as pressure from immigration officials to sign deportation documents.

The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to detailed requests for comment cited in the report.As attention surrounding the facility has intensified, demonstrations outside Delaney Hall have expanded.

Protesters have accused federal authorities and facility staff of mistreating detainees, while law enforcement agencies have responded to demonstrations with crowd-control measures that have included pepper spray, tear gas, arrests and the use of Tasers, according to accounts from participants and observers.

Family members arriving for visits described emotional encounters with relatives held inside the detention center.Guerra’s relative said his detained family member repeatedly pleaded for assistance during a recent visit following the accident.”He kept telling me, ‘Help me.

I need to leave here,'” the relative said.The emotional strain has extended beyond those detained. Family members interviewed outside the facility described anxiety, frustration and uncertainty as they navigate changing visitation rules while attempting to support relatives facing immigration proceedings.

Christopher Castro, who traveled with his mother from Long Island to visit his father, said detainees were increasingly seeking legal avenues to secure release.”My dad told me that a lot of people inside are pushing their lawyers to get them out,” Castro said after a visit.

Many families expressed concern that participation in the hunger strike could result in retaliation. Several detainees have reportedly chosen not to join the protest because they fear transfers, disciplinary measures or adverse effects on their immigration cases.

Those concerns have been amplified by allegations contained in detainees’ public statements.In their latest letter, strike participants claimed that since the protest began they had faced intimidation, discrimination and threats from both facility staff and immigration authorities.

Detainees alleged they had been threatened with deportation, transfer to other detention centers and placement in disciplinary housing units.GEO Group rejected those allegations.”GEO strongly refutes these allegations,” a company spokesperson said, stating that the facility provides around-the-clock medical care, legal and family visitation, translation services, religious accommodations and meals approved by dietitians.

The company referred questions regarding individual detainee cases to federal authorities.The dispute over conditions at Delaney Hall has unfolded amid broader national debate over immigration enforcement policies and detention practices.Federal officials have frequently described those arrested and detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement as serious offenders.

However, a recent review of ICE data conducted by Syracuse University researcher Austin Kocher found that the overwhelming majority of detainees held at Delaney Hall had no criminal convictions.According to Kocher’s analysis of mid-March detention data, approximately 88% of detainees held at the facility had no criminal conviction, while more than 70% had no criminal history at all.

Among those with convictions, many were associated with relatively low-level offenses.The findings have become a focal point for advocates who argue that public portrayals of immigration detainees often differ from available government data.

The controversy has also drawn the attention of elected officials. Oversight visits conducted by members of Congress and state officials have reportedly identified conditions consistent with complaints raised by detainees and their advocates.

One of the most visible activists connected to the protests is Gabriela Soto, whose husband Martin was detained at Delaney Hall before being transferred to another ICE facility. Soto said visits to the detention center motivated her to become involved in organizing demonstrations.”Once I started going to the visits and started seeing these people tell their stories, it made me so angry that they don’t have a voice,” she said.

Soto cited reports from detainees alleging spoiled food and unsanitary conditions as key reasons for her activism.Federal officials have repeatedly rejected allegations that detention conditions at Delaney Hall are inadequate.

The Department of Homeland Security has denied claims that detainees are being held in what it describes as “sub-prime” conditions and has similarly disputed comparable allegations involving other immigration detention facilities.Delaney Hall occupies a significant position within the federal detention system.

Operated by GEO Group, the largest private prison company in the United States, the facility is covered by a contract valued at approximately $1 billion over 15 years.For many families, however, the political debate remains secondary to concerns about loved ones inside the facility.

Guerra’s relative said he has hesitated to return for another visit after learning that visitors were being asked to provide identifying information before entering the center. He remains focused on securing medical treatment and legal assistance for his detained family member.”What is happening is inhumane,” he said. “They should have mercy. They’re human beings.”

The report found that some parents covered by a 2023 court settlement were detained or deported during the administration’s expanded immigration enforcement campaign, resulting in renewed family separations. Attorneys representing affected families said several deportations occurred despite legal safeguards intended to prevent such actions.

One case involved 11-year-old Ederson Galicia Alva, who was separated from his mother at the U.S.-Mexico border in 2018 and later reunited. In 2025, his mother was detained and deported to Guatemala, forcing the family to leave the United States before a federal judge ordered their return last month.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which led the lawsuit that ended the original family separation policy, said the renewed separations have caused further trauma to children and families already affected by earlier government actions.

The Department of Homeland Security said it complies with court orders and defended its immigration enforcement efforts, arguing that deportations and detentions are carried out under existing law.

The findings highlight renewed legal and political scrutiny of the administration’s immigration policies as federal authorities pursue large-scale deportation operations across the country.

New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill said state police took control of the area following confrontations between protesters and federal immigration agents. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka also imposed a nightly curfew around the facility.

The 1,000-bed detention center, operated by GEO Group on behalf of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has become a flashpoint in the debate over immigration enforcement under President Donald Trump. State police arrested three protesters on Saturday after six arrests the previous night.

Democratic leaders, including Hakeem Jeffries, renewed calls for the facility’s closure, citing concerns over detention conditions, while federal authorities said operations would continue as normal.

The proposal, folded into a broader roughly $70 billion immigration enforcement package aimed at restoring funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Border Patrol, has drawn resistance from several Republican lawmakers seeking more detailed justification from the White House and the U.S. Secret Service on how the funds would be allocated.

Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana said on Wednesday the legislation was effectively “back to square one” without the security funding because the necessary votes were lacking. Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina described the attempt to attach the security proposal to the immigration measure as “a bad idea,” adding that support appeared insufficient even if the package were scaled back.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune acknowledged continuing vote-count challenges and procedural hurdles linked to Senate rules governing the reconciliation process, which Republicans are using to advance the immigration enforcement bill with a simple majority rather than the chamber’s standard 60-vote threshold.

According to lawmakers familiar with the discussions, approximately $220 million of the proposed security package would finance upgrades associated with Trump’s ballroom project, while the remaining funds would support a new visitor screening center, training operations and broader protective infrastructure for the White House complex.

The proposal has become politically contentious as Democrats accuse Republicans of prioritizing spending tied to Trump while voters face elevated living costs. Some Republican lawmakers have also expressed concern over the optics of approving major expenditures linked to the president amid growing intra-party tensions.

Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana questioned the rationale for the spending proposal, saying Americans were struggling with the costs of groceries, fuel and healthcare while lawmakers debated funding “for a ballroom.”

The dispute has unfolded alongside broader Republican unease over a separate $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” settlement fund designed to compensate Trump allies who claim they were unfairly targeted by federal investigations and government agencies. Democrats are preparing amendments that could restrict or block the fund, particularly for individuals connected to the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Thune said Republican leaders were working on revised language that could impose limitations on how the settlement money is distributed. The issue has complicated negotiations as Democrats seek to force politically difficult amendment votes during the reconciliation process.

Tensions between Senate Republicans and Trump intensified further after the president renewed calls to eliminate the Senate filibuster and urged Republicans to dismiss Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough following her ruling that parts of the security proposal could not remain in the immigration legislation under reconciliation rules.

In a social media post, Trump also pressed lawmakers to pass the SAVE Act, a Republican-backed proposal requiring proof of U.S. citizenship for voters, warning Republicans to “get smart and tough” or risk losing political office.

Despite strong alignment with Trump on many policy issues, Senate Republicans have consistently resisted efforts to abolish the filibuster, which preserves the Senate’s 60-vote requirement for most legislation.

The latest disagreements also coincide with mounting frustration among Republican senators over Trump’s endorsement of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in a Republican runoff contest against incumbent Senator John Cornyn. Some Republican lawmakers privately fear the endorsement could jeopardize the party’s prospects in November’s general election.

House Speaker Mike Johnson said on Wednesday the House would pass the immigration funding bill “whatever form it takes,” even as Senate Republicans continued negotiations over the security funding and settlement provisions.

Republicans are seeking to secure funding for ICE and Border Patrol operations through the end of Trump’s term after Democrats blocked previous efforts in protest of the administration’s immigration enforcement policies and resisted negotiations that produced limited concessions from the White House.

Marie-Thérèse Ross, the widow of a retired U.S. military veteran, told The Associated Press she was arrested on April 1 at her home in Anniston, Alabama, after immigration officers arrived early in the morning and took her into custody over an alleged violation of the terms of her 90-day visa.

Ross said she was transferred to a federal immigration detention facility in Basile, Louisiana, where she shared a dormitory-style room with dozens of women, many of them mothers separated from their children.
“Some of them didn’t know where their children were,” Ross said in remarks published Tuesday by the AP. “I think it’s terrible for a woman not to know where her children are.”

According to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Ross had overstayed her visa at the time of her arrest. The department had not publicly commented further on the case as of Tuesday.

Ross returned to France after her release later in April and is recovering with relatives near Nantes. Family members told AP she continues to experience memory gaps and emotional distress following her detention and is seeking medical support for symptoms consistent with post-traumatic stress.

The case drew diplomatic attention in France after Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot publicly criticized the detention, saying the methods used by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement were “not in line” with French standards.

Ross said she had moved to the United States after marrying William B. Ross, a retired U.S. soldier she first met while he was stationed in France during the 1950s. The couple reunited decades later after both became widowed and married last year before settling in Alabama.

William Ross died in January, after which a dispute reportedly emerged over his estate. An Alabama judge later alleged in a court order that one of Ross’s stepsons, a former Alabama State Trooper now employed by the federal government, may have used his position to facilitate her detention and called for a federal investigation.

The stepson denied involvement.
Ross described conditions inside the Louisiana detention center as orderly but said guards frequently shouted at detainees and treated them condescendingly. She also recalled hearing children and babies crying at night inside the facility.

“The prison was clean, the food was okay, but it was the way they spoke to us,” Ross told AP.
Despite the conditions, Ross said detainees showed solidarity toward her because of her age, describing how women in the facility referred to her as “Grandma” and cared for her during her stay.

Her detention comes amid heightened enforcement efforts under Trump-era immigration policies that have drawn criticism from immigrant rights groups and some foreign governments over detention practices and family separations.

Ross said the experience reshaped views she once held about the United States. She said she had previously regarded the country as a place where detainees were treated fairly and respectfully but now questioned those assumptions after witnessing the treatment of women held alongside her, many of whom were from South America.

“When I left this jail in Louisiana, I told them that if I ever had the chance to speak about them, I would do it,” Ross said.

Jose Serrano, a serving U.S. soldier who completed three tours in Afghanistan, said his wife, Deisy Rivera Ortega, was arrested on April 14 during an appointment with immigration officials as the couple pursued steps toward securing her permanent residency.

“A person opened the door, escorted us through the hallway, and at the end of the hallway, my wife got arrested,” Serrano said, adding that he was not provided documentation or an explanation at the time of the detention.

Rivera Ortega, a native of El Salvador, is being held at the El Paso Service Processing Center and has challenged her detention in U.S. District Court. Her legal team has also sought to block any deportation to Mexico, arguing she has no ties to the country and citing restrictions on travel there for active-duty U.S.

troops.Her attorney, Matthew James Kozik, said Rivera Ortega held a valid work permit and had previously been granted withholding of removal to El Salvador, a form of protection that prevents deportation to a country where an individual may face harm.

The Department of Homeland Security said Rivera Ortega entered the United States illegally in 2016 and was issued a final order of removal by an immigration judge in December 2019.

In a statement, the agency said that work authorization does not confer legal status and that she remains in Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody pending removal proceedings. It did not specify whether deportation to Mexico was under consideration.

The case comes amid policy changes by the administration that have reduced discretionary protections previously extended to military families. Rivera Ortega had applied under the “parole in place” program, which has historically provided certain undocumented spouses of U.S. service members a pathway toward legal residency.

However, the Department of Homeland Security last April rescinded a 2022 policy that treated a family member’s military service as a significant mitigating factor in immigration enforcement decisions. The revised guidance states that military service alone does not exempt individuals from enforcement of immigration laws.

Serrano said he visited his wife at the detention facility on Sunday, where they communicated through a partition, as legal proceedings continue.

In a report titled “Humanity Must Win,” the London-based rights group urged FIFA and host governments to take “urgent action” to ensure the safety and rights of players, supporters and local populations during the tournament, which begins on June 11.

Amnesty said FIFA’s pledge to deliver a tournament where everyone feels “safe, included and free to exercise their rights” contrasts with conditions in host nations, particularly the United States, which will stage the majority of the 104 matches.

The organization described the U.S. as facing a “human rights emergency” under Donald Trump, citing mass deportations, arbitrary arrests and what it characterized as “paramilitary-style” operations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). It noted that ICE officials have indicated the agency will play a central role in World Cup security arrangements.

The report also referenced public backlash following the killing of two U.S. citizens during protests against ICE raids in Minneapolis earlier this year.Gaps in fan protection measuresAmnesty said host city plans published so far do not clearly address how fans or residents would be shielded from immigration enforcement during the tournament.

It added that supporters from some participating nations, including Ivory Coast, Haiti, Iran and Senegal, could face travel restrictions to the United States.LGBTQ+ fan groups in Europe have also indicated reluctance to attend matches in the U.S., citing concerns over protections for transgender individuals.

FIFA has said the expanded 48-team tournament the largest in World Cup history will proceed as scheduled, with all qualified teams expected to participate. The governing body has not publicly responded to Amnesty’s latest report.

The organization expects to generate around $11 billion in revenue from the 2026 World Cup cycle, drawing renewed scrutiny from rights groups over its responsibilities toward stakeholders.

Steve Cockburn, Amnesty’s head of economic and social justice, said that while FIFA stands to benefit financially, “fans, communities, players, journalists and workers cannot be made to pay the price.

”The tournament is set to open in Mexico City and conclude on July 19 at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey.