“They can’t do anything—it’s like they’re kidnapped there. We, their family members, want to help, but it’s not in our hands.”

Relatives of immigrants detained at the Delaney Hall immigration detention facility in New Jersey say they are increasingly concerned about the wellbeing of their loved ones as a hunger and labor strike over alleged conditions inside the center enters its third week, drawing protests, political scrutiny and competing claims from detainees, government officials and the facility’s private operator.

At the center of those concerns is Elder Guerra, a Guatemalan immigrant who has been held at Delaney Hall for nearly five months while contesting his deportation case. According to a family member who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation, Guerra suffered a serious fall in mid-May while showering inside the facility.

The relative said Guerra slipped, struck the back of his head and lost consciousness before experiencing a seizure. Other detainees reportedly urged guards to seek emergency medical assistance before Guerra was transported to a hospital.

He was later returned to Delaney Hall and placed in a medical isolation unit.Nearly three weeks after the incident, the relative said Guerra continues to experience severe headaches, dizziness, sensitivity to light, fatigue and hearing problems in one ear.”He needs medical attention.

He’s not in an adequate place to recover,” the relative said.The case has become one of several cited by detainees, advocates and family members who accuse authorities and facility operators of failing to provide adequate medical care and humane living conditions at Delaney Hall, a detention center operated by the private prison company GEO Group under contract with federal immigration authorities.

The facility has become the focus of mounting controversy since detainees launched a hunger and labor strike on May 22. Participants say the action was prompted by concerns over medical treatment, food quality, sanitation, drinking water and living conditions.

According to a letter released by detainees on May 31, those held inside the facility described what they called conditions “not fit for human beings over such a long period of time.”The letter alleged medical neglect, contaminated drinking water, expired food, unusable bathrooms and poorly maintained ventilation systems that detainees claim have contributed to frequent illness.

The detainees also demanded faster processing of immigration cases, the release of elderly and sick detainees, a meeting with New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill and an end to what they described as pressure from immigration officials to sign deportation documents.

The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to detailed requests for comment cited in the report.As attention surrounding the facility has intensified, demonstrations outside Delaney Hall have expanded.

Protesters have accused federal authorities and facility staff of mistreating detainees, while law enforcement agencies have responded to demonstrations with crowd-control measures that have included pepper spray, tear gas, arrests and the use of Tasers, according to accounts from participants and observers.

Family members arriving for visits described emotional encounters with relatives held inside the detention center.Guerra’s relative said his detained family member repeatedly pleaded for assistance during a recent visit following the accident.”He kept telling me, ‘Help me.

I need to leave here,'” the relative said.The emotional strain has extended beyond those detained. Family members interviewed outside the facility described anxiety, frustration and uncertainty as they navigate changing visitation rules while attempting to support relatives facing immigration proceedings.

Christopher Castro, who traveled with his mother from Long Island to visit his father, said detainees were increasingly seeking legal avenues to secure release.”My dad told me that a lot of people inside are pushing their lawyers to get them out,” Castro said after a visit.

Many families expressed concern that participation in the hunger strike could result in retaliation. Several detainees have reportedly chosen not to join the protest because they fear transfers, disciplinary measures or adverse effects on their immigration cases.

Those concerns have been amplified by allegations contained in detainees’ public statements.In their latest letter, strike participants claimed that since the protest began they had faced intimidation, discrimination and threats from both facility staff and immigration authorities.

Detainees alleged they had been threatened with deportation, transfer to other detention centers and placement in disciplinary housing units.GEO Group rejected those allegations.”GEO strongly refutes these allegations,” a company spokesperson said, stating that the facility provides around-the-clock medical care, legal and family visitation, translation services, religious accommodations and meals approved by dietitians.

The company referred questions regarding individual detainee cases to federal authorities.The dispute over conditions at Delaney Hall has unfolded amid broader national debate over immigration enforcement policies and detention practices.Federal officials have frequently described those arrested and detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement as serious offenders.

However, a recent review of ICE data conducted by Syracuse University researcher Austin Kocher found that the overwhelming majority of detainees held at Delaney Hall had no criminal convictions.According to Kocher’s analysis of mid-March detention data, approximately 88% of detainees held at the facility had no criminal conviction, while more than 70% had no criminal history at all.

Among those with convictions, many were associated with relatively low-level offenses.The findings have become a focal point for advocates who argue that public portrayals of immigration detainees often differ from available government data.

The controversy has also drawn the attention of elected officials. Oversight visits conducted by members of Congress and state officials have reportedly identified conditions consistent with complaints raised by detainees and their advocates.

One of the most visible activists connected to the protests is Gabriela Soto, whose husband Martin was detained at Delaney Hall before being transferred to another ICE facility. Soto said visits to the detention center motivated her to become involved in organizing demonstrations.”Once I started going to the visits and started seeing these people tell their stories, it made me so angry that they don’t have a voice,” she said.

Soto cited reports from detainees alleging spoiled food and unsanitary conditions as key reasons for her activism.Federal officials have repeatedly rejected allegations that detention conditions at Delaney Hall are inadequate.

The Department of Homeland Security has denied claims that detainees are being held in what it describes as “sub-prime” conditions and has similarly disputed comparable allegations involving other immigration detention facilities.Delaney Hall occupies a significant position within the federal detention system.

Operated by GEO Group, the largest private prison company in the United States, the facility is covered by a contract valued at approximately $1 billion over 15 years.For many families, however, the political debate remains secondary to concerns about loved ones inside the facility.

Guerra’s relative said he has hesitated to return for another visit after learning that visitors were being asked to provide identifying information before entering the center. He remains focused on securing medical treatment and legal assistance for his detained family member.”What is happening is inhumane,” he said. “They should have mercy. They’re human beings.”

The measure would provide funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the U.S. Border Patrol through the remainder of Trump’s current term in office.

The legislation now moves to the House of Representatives, where Republican leaders are aiming for swift passage as early as next week before sending the bill to the president for his signature.

The funding package comes after months of political battles in Washington over immigration enforcement, deportations and border security, issues that have remained central to Trump’s domestic policy agenda.

Pauline Hanson is emerging as a central force in Australian politics nearly three decades after entering federal parliament, as growing economic anxiety, concerns over immigration and dissatisfaction with mainstream parties fuel renewed support for rightwing populism.

The resurgence of Hanson’s One Nation has intensified pressure on both the governing Labor Party and the opposition Liberal-National Coalition, with both major political blocs adjusting policy positions in response to shifting voter sentiment.

This month, One Nation secured its first federal lower house seat after defeating conservative candidates in the rural electorate of Farrer, a district long considered a stronghold of the Coalition. The result followed gains in South Australia’s state election earlier this year and marked a significant breakthrough for a party that for years struggled to convert national attention into sustained parliamentary representation.

Angus Taylor described the Farrer byelection outcome as an “existential moment” for the Coalition, which has faced internal instability and declining support since its defeat in the 2025 federal election.The rise of One Nation mirrors broader international trends in rightwing populism associated with figures such as Donald Trump in the United States and Nigel Farage in Britain.

Hanson’s messaging has focused heavily on immigration, opposition to climate policies and criticism of political institutions, themes that analysts say resonate with economically insecure and politically disillusioned voters.

Former deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce, who defected from the National Party of Australia to One Nation last year, said voter frustration was being driven by fears of economic decline and a perceived lack of long-term national direction.

“There is a frustration, there is a malaise,” Joyce said. “People feel they are going to hand to their children a lesser nation than their parents handed to them.”Hanson first entered national politics in 1996 after being disendorsed as a candidate for the Liberal Party of Australia over controversial remarks about Indigenous Australians.

Running as an independent, she won the Queensland seat of Oxley and used her maiden parliamentary speech to attack multiculturalism and warn that Australia risked being “swamped by Asians.”Her rhetoric made her one of the country’s most polarizing political figures. In 1997, she co-founded One Nation, which rapidly gained traction, particularly in Queensland.

The party secured 11 seats at the 1998 Queensland state election, though Hanson herself later lost federal representation despite receiving the highest primary vote in her electorate under Australia’s preferential voting system.Hanson spent nearly two decades largely outside federal politics, a period that included failed campaigns, internal party disputes and a prison sentence for electoral fraud convictions that were later overturned on appeal.

She returned to the Senate in 2016 and remained a prominent figure through a series of controversial campaigns focused on immigration, Islam and national identity.Among the most widely criticized incidents was her appearance in the Senate chamber wearing a burqa in support of proposals to ban the garment, an act she repeated in 2025 and which resulted in a parliamentary suspension.

Despite persistent controversy, One Nation’s electoral support continued to grow. The party secured 6.4% of the national vote at the 2025 election, roughly doubling its previous result.Its momentum accelerated after a mass shooting at a Hanukkah gathering in Sydney’s Bondi area in December that killed 15 people. Authorities described the attack as allegedly inspired by the militant group Islamic State.

Hanson and Joyce attended memorial events for victims while simultaneously linking the incident to broader immigration and security debates.Polling conducted after the attack showed One Nation overtaking the Coalition in some voter surveys, particularly in working-class outer suburban areas where dissatisfaction with housing affordability and cost-of-living pressures has intensified.

The Coalition’s response has included a more aggressive stance on immigration and border policy following the appointment of new leadership after its 2025 defeat. Political observers say the party is increasingly attempting to reclaim conservative voters shifting toward Hanson.

At the same time, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and the governing Australian Labor Party have also adjusted policy positions amid concerns that economic insecurity is driving support for populist movements.

Labor this week abandoned an earlier election commitment not to alter tax concessions benefiting property investors, part of a broader housing affordability package intended to address rising public concern over home ownership access among younger Australians.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers framed the policy shift as a response to broader political and economic pressures reshaping democracies globally.“We’re doing what’s necessary, not what’s convenient, at a time of extraordinary, accelerating change in the world playing out in our economy and society,” Chalmers said.

“And when you look around the world, from Farage to Farrer the choice this moment presents for parties of government is clear.”Chalmers argued Labor remained “the sensible centre” of Australian politics while acknowledging that both major parties were under growing pressure to respond to rapidly changing voter expectations.

As One Nation expands beyond its traditional regional and protest-vote base, analysts say the party’s influence is now being measured not only by seats won, but by its ability to shape the national political agenda and force strategic recalibrations from Australia’s two dominant parties.

A series of documentary photography exhibitions presented through New York’s annual Photoville festival is drawing attention to themes of gender identity, immigration, incarceration and Indigenous cultural preservation, reflecting a broader shift toward socially engaged visual storytelling in contemporary photography.

The exhibitions, curated across multiple outdoor and gallery spaces, bring together photographers examining subjects ranging from transgender identity in the Netherlands to rehabilitation programmes inside maximum-security prisons in the United States. Organisers say this year’s projects place particular emphasis on human connection and emotional resilience at a time of political and social division.

One of the featured exhibitions centres on the late Dutch photographer Diana Blok Wolff, whose portraits documented transgender individuals and gender expression decades before such issues entered mainstream public debate. According to Wolff associate Brouwer, a commitment was made during the photographer’s lifetime to preserve and promote her work internationally.

Recent exhibitions in Amsterdam and New York City have introduced new audiences to Wolff’s archive, which Brouwer described as deeply focused on individual identity rather than social categorisation. “He really looked at people as individuals,” Brouwer said. “It was always the individual he wanted to photograph.

”Another exhibition, titled Point of View, combines self-portraits created by Dutch college students exploring gender identity with historical artworks from the archives of Rijksmuseum. Curator Barzilay said the project was intended both to encourage reflection on gender identity and to normalise the existence of transgender people within broader historical narratives.

Barzilay described the inclusion of transgender-related imagery in the Rijksmuseum collection as culturally significant because it demonstrated that gender diversity had long existed within Dutch society. “We’re still litigating a thing that people have already resolved,” he said.Questions surrounding gender identity and transgender representation have become increasingly politicised internationally in recent years, particularly in debates over education, healthcare and public policy.

Museums and cultural institutions across Europe and North America have expanded efforts to incorporate LGBTQ+ histories into permanent collections and exhibitions.Another project presented at Photoville, The Avillas by photographer Lexi Parra, examines the impact of immigration enforcement on a family after its matriarch self-deported from the United States amid fears linked to anti-immigration rhetoric during the administration of Donald Trump.

The series documents the family’s attempts to adapt after separation from a central parental figure, presenting the emotional and social consequences of immigration policies on mixed-status households. Barzilay described the project as an examination of “what happens when a beloved member of a family is torn away from it.

”Immigration policy during Trump’s presidency included stricter border enforcement measures, expanded deportation operations and heightened political debate over undocumented migration. Advocacy organisations have argued that these policies contributed to fear and instability among immigrant communities across the United States.

Among the most widely discussed exhibitions at the festival is Puppies Behind Bars, a collaborative project by photographers Ashley Gilbertson and Ava Pellor documenting a prison rehabilitation initiative inside Green Haven Correctional Facility, a maximum-security prison in New York state.

The programme allows incarcerated men to raise puppies that are later trained as service dogs. Gloria Gilbert Stoga, founder of the organisation Puppies Behind Bars, said she intentionally sought photographers experienced in conflict and crisis reporting because of the psychological intensity of prison environments.

Gilbertson is known internationally for his coverage of the Iraq War, while Pellor has documented wildfires and migrant border crossings in the Balkans. Their images capture daily life within the prison while focusing on emotional vulnerability and rehabilitation among inmates participating in the programme.

“The dogs humanize an environment that’s devoid of all humanity,” Gilbertson said, describing the programme’s effect on participants. He said caring for animals gave many inmates responsibility, emotional openness and continuity that had previously been absent from their lives.

Pellor recalled photographing a prisoner who became emotional after receiving a puppy for the first time. According to Pellor, the inmate remained physically close to the dog throughout the day after breaking down in tears during an outdoor walk.

Criminal justice researchers in the United States have increasingly studied animal-assisted rehabilitation programmes within prisons, with some studies suggesting they can improve emotional regulation, reduce disciplinary incidents and support reintegration efforts after release.

Another exhibition attracting attention is The Women’s Grass by Whitney Snow, which documents the cultural and spiritual significance of sweetgrass within the Blackfeet Nation community.

Sweetgrass has long held ceremonial and medicinal importance among Indigenous groups in North America, with harvesting traditions often passed between generations of women. Snow said women with extensive knowledge of the plant hold respected positions within Blackfeet society.

The photographer said she worked closely with tribal elders during production of the project to ensure sacred traditions were represented respectfully and without exploitation. Snow described her approach as an attempt to balance cultural education for outside audiences with the need to preserve community boundaries.

Her images focus on the landscapes, rituals and emotional connections surrounding sweetgrass harvesting, emphasising calmness and interconnectedness with nature rather than ethnographic spectacle.

Curators said many projects submitted to this year’s Photoville festival unexpectedly centred on joy, healing and emotional renewal despite addressing subjects often associated with trauma or political conflict.

Indonesian immigration chief Hendarsam Marantoko said the government was reassessing visa waiver arrangements following a surge in cases involving foreign nationals allegedly engaged in cyber fraud, online gambling and other illicit activities.

Authorities last week detained more than 500 suspects in two separate operations targeting an online gambling syndicate in Jakarta and a scam network in Batam in the eastern Riau Islands province, officials said.

Those arrested included nationals from Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, Laos and Myanmar, all of which currently benefit from Indonesia’s 30-day visa-free entry scheme. Chinese nationals were also among those detained, although China is not covered by the waiver policy.

“Cases of foreigners involved in illegal activities, including those coming from countries granted visa-free entry facilities, give rise to evaluation” of existing policies, Hendarsam said in a statement released by immigration authorities.

Investigators found that many suspects linked to the Jakarta gambling operation had entered Indonesia either under visa-free arrangements or through permits issued on arrival, according to officials.

Indonesia has intensified immigration enforcement in recent weeks as authorities seek to curb transnational cybercrime and illegal online betting operations, which have proliferated across parts of Southeast Asia.

Hendarsam said immigration authorities had conducted more than 6,700 administrative enforcement actions in recent weeks, including over 2,000 deportations and revocations of residence permits tied to immigration violations and criminal investigations.

Southeast Asian governments have faced mounting pressure to crack down on cross-border scam compounds and online gambling syndicates, many of which operate through regional networks involving foreign workers and digital financial transactions.

Marie-Thérèse Ross, the widow of a retired U.S. military veteran, told The Associated Press she was arrested on April 1 at her home in Anniston, Alabama, after immigration officers arrived early in the morning and took her into custody over an alleged violation of the terms of her 90-day visa.

Ross said she was transferred to a federal immigration detention facility in Basile, Louisiana, where she shared a dormitory-style room with dozens of women, many of them mothers separated from their children.
“Some of them didn’t know where their children were,” Ross said in remarks published Tuesday by the AP. “I think it’s terrible for a woman not to know where her children are.”

According to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Ross had overstayed her visa at the time of her arrest. The department had not publicly commented further on the case as of Tuesday.

Ross returned to France after her release later in April and is recovering with relatives near Nantes. Family members told AP she continues to experience memory gaps and emotional distress following her detention and is seeking medical support for symptoms consistent with post-traumatic stress.

The case drew diplomatic attention in France after Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot publicly criticized the detention, saying the methods used by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement were “not in line” with French standards.

Ross said she had moved to the United States after marrying William B. Ross, a retired U.S. soldier she first met while he was stationed in France during the 1950s. The couple reunited decades later after both became widowed and married last year before settling in Alabama.

William Ross died in January, after which a dispute reportedly emerged over his estate. An Alabama judge later alleged in a court order that one of Ross’s stepsons, a former Alabama State Trooper now employed by the federal government, may have used his position to facilitate her detention and called for a federal investigation.

The stepson denied involvement.
Ross described conditions inside the Louisiana detention center as orderly but said guards frequently shouted at detainees and treated them condescendingly. She also recalled hearing children and babies crying at night inside the facility.

“The prison was clean, the food was okay, but it was the way they spoke to us,” Ross told AP.
Despite the conditions, Ross said detainees showed solidarity toward her because of her age, describing how women in the facility referred to her as “Grandma” and cared for her during her stay.

Her detention comes amid heightened enforcement efforts under Trump-era immigration policies that have drawn criticism from immigrant rights groups and some foreign governments over detention practices and family separations.

Ross said the experience reshaped views she once held about the United States. She said she had previously regarded the country as a place where detainees were treated fairly and respectfully but now questioned those assumptions after witnessing the treatment of women held alongside her, many of whom were from South America.

“When I left this jail in Louisiana, I told them that if I ever had the chance to speak about them, I would do it,” Ross said.

As concerns over declining U.S. birthrates increasingly shape Republican political messaging, several high-profile pregnancies within President Donald Trump’s administration have emerged as public symbols of a broader conservative campaign promoting motherhood, family formation and pronatalist policy narratives.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt gave birth on May 1, becoming the first serving White House press secretary in U.S. history to deliver a child while holding the position. Her pregnancy, along with those of Katie Miller and Second Lady Usha Vance, has been prominently discussed across conservative media and political circles as evidence of what some Republicans describe as a “pro-family” administration.

The pregnancies have coincided with growing debate inside the Republican Party over gender roles, family policy and the economic pressures shaping decisions about parenthood in the United States. Federal data cited in the discussion showed U.S. fertility rates fell again in 2025 to another record low, intensifying political focus on demographic decline and family formation.

Leavitt publicly framed motherhood in explicitly personal and ideological terms throughout her pregnancy. In a social media post accompanying a maternity photo shoot, she wrote: “There is no greater blessing than motherhood. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.” Earlier, following a March baby shower attended by White House staff at Trump National Golf Club in Virginia, Leavitt said she felt “blessed” to be surrounded by supportive women before the arrival of her second child.

Conservative commentators and Republican-aligned media outlets have increasingly connected such public messaging to broader electoral narratives. A January opinion article in The Wall Street Journal described Republicans as the “party of parents” while portraying Democrats as increasingly disconnected from family-centered voters.

Political analysts interviewed in the original reporting said the symbolism attached to these pregnancies extends beyond personal milestones. Ronnee Schreiber said the messaging functions politically because it aligns closely with President Trump’s broader goals around birthrates, traditional family structures and cultural identity.

According to Schreiber, the visibility of pregnant women within senior Republican circles provides a powerful embodiment of the administration’s pronatalist rhetoric in ways broader political messaging cannot easily replicate.Miller, a conservative media figure married to senior White House adviser Stephen Miller, has been among the administration’s most vocal advocates for pronatalist arguments online.

In one March social media post, she wrote that “children shouldn’t be delayed for careers” and described families as foundational social institutions. Her social media activity has frequently linked declining Western birthrates to broader cultural and immigration debates.

The Republican emphasis on family growth, however, has unfolded alongside internal tensions over the role of working mothers and government support for childcare. While the administration has celebrated motherhood publicly, critics and academics cited in the reporting questioned whether Republican policy proposals adequately address the economic realities facing American families.

“We can’t take care of daycare,” President Donald Trump reportedly said during a closed-door Easter event, according to the article, while discussing the country’s broader economic and geopolitical responsibilities.Researchers and policy analysts noted that rising housing costs, childcare expenses and grocery prices continue to influence decisions around parenthood.

The article also referenced concerns about federal spending reductions affecting social safety-net programs, including Medicaid and food assistance initiatives that many families rely upon.According to the report, Republican proposals connected to family policy have included expanding child tax credits while reconsidering federal support mechanisms tied to daycare and childcare assistance.

More than 80% of stay-at-home parents in the United States are women, according to figures cited in the article.Tammy Vigil said the Republican Party faces an unresolved contradiction between promoting women into visible political leadership positions while simultaneously endorsing rhetoric favoring traditional domestic roles for mothers.

That debate has also surfaced within conservative intellectual circles. Writer Maria Baer of the Institute for Family Studies argued in commentary cited by the report that no institution requires women more than their own children, reflecting arguments increasingly common among socially conservative groups advocating for larger families and traditional household structures.

Leavitt’s own work schedule became part of that discussion after she returned to work shortly after giving birth to her first child during the 2024 presidential campaign. According to the report, she initially planned a short leave before returning to work only days later following the assassination attempt against Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania.

Her rapid return was praised in some conservative circles as evidence of loyalty, discipline and professional commitment. Others on the political right criticized later comments in which Leavitt said balancing work and motherhood provided “the greatest perspective,” arguing the remarks undervalued stay-at-home parenting.The tensions surrounding motherhood and professional identity have been particularly visible in discussions around Usha Vance.

Before becoming second lady, Vance worked as a lawyer and clerked for Chief Justice John Roberts. During her pregnancy announcements and public appearances, however, she largely emphasized family life and parenting.In comments tied to the launch of her children’s podcast, “Storytime With the Second Lady,” Vance highlighted support received from military medical staff and White House personnel while balancing public responsibilities with raising children.

The article noted that Vance has largely avoided publicly addressing the administration’s immigration crackdown, despite demographic experts identifying immigration as a significant factor influencing population growth trends in the United States.Miranda Brady said the administration’s pronatalist rhetoric conflicts with immigration enforcement policies that may reduce population growth.

Brady argued that concerns around fertility decline risk becoming politically distorted when detached from broader demographic and economic realities.The discussion surrounding Republican pronatalism has increasingly merged with wider ideological debates over immigration, cultural identity and gender roles. Miller’s social media commentary frequently referenced concerns about migration and demographic change while linking them to declining birthrates across Western countries.

Despite the administration’s public emphasis on family growth, federal fertility data cited in the article indicated no measurable reversal in long-term demographic trends. Analysts interviewed throughout the report said economic pressures, childcare costs and labor market realities continue to shape family planning decisions more strongly than political messaging alone.

Rubio, a Catholic and the highest-ranking U.S. official to meet the first American pope since his election in May 2025, held a private audience with Leo at the Vatican before separate discussions with Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin.

“The meeting underscored the strong relationship between the United States and the Holy See and their shared commitment to promoting peace and human dignity,” U.S. State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott said after the talks.According to the State Department, discussions focused on the Middle East conflict, the Iran war and issues concerning Latin America, referred to by Washington as the Western Hemisphere.

A U.S. official also confirmed that the Catholic Church’s role in Cuba was raised during the meetings.The Holy See has historically maintained diplomatic engagement with Cuba, while Rubio, a Cuban-American, has been closely associated with U.S. efforts aimed at political change in the communist-run island nation.

Rubio also discussed religious freedom and broader geopolitical issues with Parolin, Pigott said.

The visit followed an unusually public rift between Trump and Pope Leo, who has repeatedly called for peace in the Middle East and criticized threats of military escalation against Iran.Trump recently accused the pope of being “weak on crime and terrible for foreign policy” and alleged this week that Leo’s positions risked “endangering a lot of Catholics and a lot of people.”

Leo rejected the criticism during remarks to reporters on Tuesday, saying the Catholic Church’s role was to “preach peace” and reiterating the Vatican’s longstanding opposition to nuclear weapons.“If anyone wishes to criticize me for proclaiming the Gospel, let them do so truthfully,” the pope said.

Cardinal Parolin earlier suggested the meeting would involve candid exchanges, noting that Washington had requested the talks. “The pope is being the pope,” Parolin said on Wednesday when asked about Trump’s criticism.Despite the tensions, Vatican protocol signaled a warm reception for Rubio. His convoy entered through the Arch of Bells, an honor generally reserved for heads of state, and he was formally welcomed by the Swiss Guard.

Rubio told reporters before departing for Rome that the trip had been arranged prior to the recent dispute and described the Vatican as an important diplomatic partner. “There’s a lot to talk about with the Vatican,” he said.

The Trump administration had initially welcomed Leo’s election as the first U.S.-born pope, but relations have since deteriorated over disagreements on immigration, Middle East policy and nuclear rhetoric involving Iran.

The remarks originated from U.S. conservative radio host Michael Savage during an episode of his show “The Savage Nation,” in which he criticized birthright citizenship in the United States and referred to countries including India and China in derogatory terms.

Trump reposted a transcript of the comments on his Truth Social platform on Thursday without adding his own remarks.

India’s foreign ministry responded strongly, with spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal saying the remarks were “obviously uninformed, inappropriate and in poor taste,” and did not reflect the longstanding relationship between the two countries.

“The remarks certainly do not reflect the reality of the India-U.S. relationship, which has long been based on mutual respect and shared interests,” Jaiswal said in a statement.

The U.S. embassy in New Delhi cited Trump as having previously described India as “a great country,” seeking to underscore the broader context of ties between the two nations.The comments come amid ongoing debate in the United States over birthright citizenship, with Trump pursuing restrictions that are currently under legal challenge in the Supreme Court.

Earlier this month, he attended a hearing on the issue in a rare presidential visit to the court.India’s main opposition Indian National Congress condemned the remarks as “extremely insulting,” urging Prime Minister Narendra Modi to formally raise the issue with Washington.

Government data show approximately 5.5 million people of Indian origin reside in the United States, forming one of the largest Asian-origin communities alongside Chinese Americans.Despite the diplomatic friction, both countries have been engaged in efforts to strengthen economic ties.

Following a period of trade tensions, including the imposition of high U.S. tariffs on Indian goods last year, New Delhi and Washington are currently working toward a trade agreement aimed at boosting bilateral commerce and avoiding further tariff escalations.

The airline’s notice did not specify the duration of the restriction or provide detailed justification, but the move comes against the backdrop of escalating geopolitical frictions in the region.

Separately, the website of budget carrier Flydubai indicated that Iranian nationals holding a valid UAE “Golden Visa” are exempt from the restriction and remain eligible to enter and transit the country.

The exemption suggests that long-term residency status continues to be recognized despite broader entry limitations.Neither Emirates nor Flydubai immediately issued additional statements clarifying operational details, including whether the restrictions apply uniformly across all routes or are subject to further regulatory guidance.

The UAE authorities have not publicly outlined a comprehensive policy announcement accompanying the airline updates. However, aviation advisories and carrier-level restrictions are often aligned with government directives during periods of regional instability.

The measures coincide with rising tensions involving Iran and neighboring states, which have increasingly affected aviation routes, airspace usage, and cross-border mobility. Airlines operating in the Gulf have in recent years adjusted policies in response to security concerns, diplomatic developments, and regulatory changes.

It remains unclear how many passengers may be affected by the restriction or whether additional carriers operating to the UAE will adopt similar measures.