His remarks came in response to a question by the show’s host, Zahack Tanvir, who asked whether it would “be really … logical enough” to involve Pakistan in the Gaza Stabilisation Force — and what repercussions might follow.

Meyer’s answer was unequivocal. “I think you have to choose,” he said. “Either Pakistan will be involved or we can have a stabilisation force. The two are not going to happen together.” He added that the same logic applies to any other state — including those like Qatar — that some have proposed might contribute to the force.

“You know, there’s the old expression of inviting the fox into the hen house,” Meyer argued. “Once you have … bad actors … the only result is going to be negative.” He said it “does not take a crystal ball” to see the consequences and described even the possibility of such inclusion as “ludicrous.”

The debate unfolded against the backdrop of recent developments: the ISF has been proposed as part of a broader peace plan aimed at stabilising the Gaza Strip following ongoing conflict. Under that plan, a multinational peacekeeping force would be mandated to help restore security, oversee demilitarisation and facilitate the rebuilding of Gaza.

Countries such as Egypt, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates have been frequently discussed in connection with potential troop contributions — but according to Meyer, inviting Pakistan into the mix would seriously undercut the force’s legitimacy.

Also participating in the podcast discussion were other security and regional-experts: Siddhant Kishore, a national-security analyst based in Washington DC; Yeshaya Rosenman, an India–Israel specialist in Jerusalem; and Irina Tsukerman, attorney and national security analyst. Their collective participation underscored the gravity of the conversation, which framed the ISF not only as a means for peace-building, but also as a test of the international community’s resolve to exclude parties deemed incompatible with such a mission.

Meyer’s intervention resounds especially strongly given the background against which the podcast was framed — a remembrance of the 2008 terror attacks in Mumbai, widely attributed to militants operating out of Pakistan. The episode aimed both to honour the memory of the victims and to raise awareness of what the hosts described as “Pakistan-sponsored terror.”

For the international audience, Meyer’s warning is likely to add weight to ongoing debates over the composition and mandate of the ISF. Critics of including contested actors warn that doing so could undermine both operational discipline and political legitimacy; proponents counter that broad inclusion may be necessary for regional buy-in. With the Gaza conflict continuing to exert global repercussions, the question of who gets to stabilise Gaza remains deeply fraught.

The discussions focused on coordinated efforts to ensure security, governance, reconstruction, and humanitarian aid, emphasizing a shared vision for a stable and prosperous Gaza.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said the Paris meeting provided a platform for countries to outline their contributions and commitments to Gaza’s recovery.

“We discussed the major fields to which we intend to contribute: security, governance, reconstruction, and humanitarian aid,” Barrot told reporters. “These contributions will be shared with the United States so they can be integrated into broader peace efforts.”

The meeting included prominent figures from Europe and the Arab world, such as Qatar’s Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman al-Thani, Egypt’s Foreign Minister, and Turkey’s Foreign Minister, all of whom were instrumental in facilitating the recent ceasefire.

EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas described the gathering as a critical opportunity to build on the ceasefire and move toward lasting peace. “This is the best chance we have right now,” she said. “We must work together to ensure the plan is sustainable for the future.”

A key topic of discussion was the creation of an international stabilisation force, which would operate under a United Nations mandate to monitor the ceasefire, assist in the disarmament of Hamas, and support the transfer of security responsibilities to the Palestinian Authority.

Countries including Indonesia, Italy, and Azerbaijan expressed interest in joining the mission. Italy’s Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani noted, “We want to be major players—not just in security—but also in reconstruction, to help Gaza rebuild for a better tomorrow.”

The discussions also included detailed proposals to train and equip 10,000 Palestinian Authority security personnel in a phased approach. This plan aims to strengthen local governance while providing stability across Gaza.

France and Britain have already initiated talks at the United Nations on a possible mandate for the multinational stabilisation force, reflecting the strong international commitment to a secure and peaceful Gaza.

The United Nations Assembly recently endorsed a declaration outlining steps toward a two-state solution, condemning violence, and urging Hamas to disarm.

European and Arab officials said the Paris meeting was essential to fill gaps in the U.S.-led peace plan and ensure that the ceasefire evolves into a sustainable peace with tangible results on the ground.

Diplomatic sources highlighted that the success of the plan would depend on joint international action, combining efforts in security, reconstruction, and governance.

By leveraging the expertise and resources of multiple countries, the initiative seeks to empower Gaza’s local population, rebuild critical infrastructure, and provide essential humanitarian aid.

The Paris talks reflect a new era of proactive diplomacy, where European and Arab partners work side by side with the United States to support post-war recovery.

The discussions also focused on practical strategies for reconstruction, including restoring essential services, reviving economic activity, and enhancing governance structures to prevent future conflicts.

Officials emphasized that the coordinated plan will prioritize long-term stability and sustainable development in Gaza, ensuring that humanitarian needs are met while creating conditions for economic growth and social cohesion.

By fostering collaboration between multiple countries, the initiative is designed to deliver meaningful and measurable improvements for residents of Gaza.

The commitment to reconstruction also includes financial support, technical assistance, and capacity building to ensure that Gaza can stand on its own in the future.

European and Arab partners are preparing to invest in projects that strengthen local institutions, improve public services, and provide opportunities for education and employment.

The Paris meeting sends a strong signal that the international community is united in its vision for a peaceful, secure, and thriving Gaza.

By combining diplomacy, reconstruction efforts, and security measures, European and Arab nations aim to create a sustainable framework for stability that can endure well beyond the current ceasefire.

With continued collaboration and active engagement from multiple countries, Gaza’s future can be marked by security, prosperity, and hope, demonstrating the power of multilateral diplomacy to transform post-conflict recovery into lasting peace.