
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>landlord repossession &#8211; The Milli Chronicle</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.millichronicle.com/tag/landlord-repossession/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.millichronicle.com</link>
	<description>Factual Version of a Story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:41:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>England’s Renters’ Rights Overhaul Raises Pressure on Courts as Landlords and Tenants Brace for Change</title>
		<link>https://www.millichronicle.com/2026/04/66082.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewsDesk MC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 02:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn tenants union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clara Collingwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eviction law England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing courts England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing reform UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlord court delays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlord repossession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martyn Gerrard estate agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ministry of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Residential Landlords Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no fault eviction ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private rented sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rent increase limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rental arrears UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rental housing policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renters Reform Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renters Rights Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 21 eviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenant eviction crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenant rights UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK property law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://millichronicle.com/?p=66082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[“When rent stops and court delays stretch for months, landlords and tenants alike are left trapped in a housing system]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>“When rent stops and court delays stretch for months, landlords and tenants alike are left trapped in a housing system struggling to keep pace with reform.”</em></p>



<p>England’s private rental sector is entering one of its most significant legal transitions in decades as the government’s Renters’ Rights Act comes into force on May 1, reshaping eviction rules, tenant protections and landlord obligations across the country.</p>



<p>The legislation, described as the largest overhaul of the private rented sector in a generation, is designed to provide renters with greater security by banning so-called “no fault evictions,” limiting rent increases, and restricting landlords to specific legal grounds for regaining possession of their properties. While tenant advocacy groups have welcomed the reforms, landlord associations warn that the changes will increase dependence on an already congested court system and could deepen delays in repossession cases.</p>



<p>For Rongmala, a 57-year-old south London property owner, the issue is already acute. She became what she describes as an “accidental” landlord after health problems and disabilities meant she could no longer live alone. She moved in with her children and rented out her maisonette to help support herself financially.Last year, her tenant stopped paying rent.</p>



<p>After several months without payments, Rongmala served an eviction notice and began legal proceedings. Despite eventually securing a possession order from a judge, her tenant remains in the property, with rent arrears now reaching around £15,000.Under current rules, only court-appointed bailiffs can enforce the removal of a tenant after a possession order has been granted. </p>



<p>Rongmala’s family says they were told the wait for bailiff enforcement could take up to 11 months.The financial burden has continued to grow. In addition to the unpaid rent, she says she has had to cover £2,500 in boiler repairs, service charges for the estate, and mortgage payments on the property.</p>



<p> The loss of rental income has also affected her mental health.“My children are helping me for everything, but I don’t want that,” she said, describing the financial strain as a source of depression.Her son, Marouf, said the family had found the court process difficult to navigate and described the prolonged delay as emotionally and financially exhausting. </p>



<p>He said watching his mother struggle had been “heartbreaking,” adding that she felt powerless while waiting for enforcement.Landlord groups argue that cases like Rongmala’s could become more common under the new legal framework because the abolition of Section 21 notices will force more landlords to rely on formal court processes.Currently, landlords in England can use a Section 21 notice to evict tenants without giving a reason, provided they give at least eight weeks’ notice.</p>



<p> Under the new legislation, landlords will only be able to seek possession under specific legal grounds, including persistent rent arrears, anti-social behaviour, or if they intend to move back into the property themselves.Tenant organisations say the change is long overdue.Clara Collingwood, interim director of The Renters Reform Coalition, said the end of Section 21 evictions would make a “huge difference” to renters who have long faced insecurity and sudden displacement.</p>



<p>Renters interviewed described repeated moves, rising housing costs and uncertainty over long-term housing stability. Rosie, a young professional attending a housing protest in London, said she and her friends had moved “dozens of times,” while some were spending as much as 70% of their salaries on rent.</p>



<p>Fran Brown, 58, said she had moved properties five times since 2017 and was now facing another rent increase. She said she felt she was “at the mercy of the landlord changing their mind,” reflecting concerns among renters about short-notice changes in tenancy arrangements.</p>



<p>Another renter, James, said he received what he described as a “terrifying” eviction notice at the end of February and was struggling to find a new home for himself, his wife and two children after spending 10 years in the same property.“It’s really tough to face the reality of needing to pack up our entire lives,” he said.</p>



<p>The Ministry of Justice says private landlords currently wait a median of 26 weeks between filing a possession claim and regaining control of a property. A decade ago, that figure was approximately 16 weeks, highlighting how court delays have lengthened even before the latest reforms take effect.</p>



<p>Landlord representatives say the government has not done enough to prepare the court system for the additional demand expected once Section 21 is removed.The National Residential Landlords’ Association has warned that longer delays could discourage investment in the private rented sector, particularly for smaller landlords who rely on rental income to meet mortgage and maintenance costs.</p>



<p>Ben Beadle and other sector representatives have argued that landlords already face mounting pressures from tax changes, higher borrowing costs and stricter regulatory obligations. Some believe the new framework could push more owners to sell.Taylor, cited in the report, said that changes to landlord taxation combined with “ever-increasing regulation” were making continued investment less attractive and that more landlords may decide the returns are no longer worthwhile.</p>



<p>Greg Tsuman, director at Martyn Gerrard estate agents in London, said landlords had been leaving the market for years, but the pace had accelerated over the past 12 months.Legal service provider Landlord Action and tenants’ union Acorn have both reported a rise in Section 21 notices ahead of the reforms. According to Acorn, Section 21 cases accounted for 22% of its tenant casework in 2024, rising to 31% so far in 2026.</p>



<p>The increase reflects concerns that some landlords may be seeking possession before the legal changes remove the option entirely.Chris Norris of the National Residential Landlords’ Association said he did not expect an “exodus” of landlords from the market but believed some property owners could become more selective about prospective tenants.</p>



<p>Although the Renters’ Rights Act makes it unlawful to discriminate against tenants with children or those receiving benefits, landlords will still retain discretion over final tenant selection, raising concerns among housing advocates that informal discrimination could persist.Not all landlords oppose the reforms.</p>



<p>Rick Gannon, a landlord with 70 properties valued at more than £10 million, said he believed the legislation would improve standards and remove poor practices from the sector.“I think it’s the biggest change we’ve seen in this industry for many, many years and I think most of it is for the better,” he said, adding that the reforms could help “weed out bad landlords.”Rongmala and her son say they support stronger protections for responsible tenants and do not want renters to struggle. </p>



<p>Their concern, they say, is whether the system can deliver fairness for both sides when legal remedies take months to enforce and financial losses continue to mount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
