The elections across England, Scotland and Wales marked Labour’s most serious political setback since the party returned to power in the 2024 general election, ending more than a decade of Conservative-led government.Writing in Britain’s Guardian newspaper, Starmer acknowledged public dissatisfaction following Thursday’s vote but rejected calls for Labour to shift ideologically in response to the results.“

The right lesson is to listen to voters,” Starmer wrote, adding that doing so “doesn’t mean tacking right or left.”The strongest advances came from Reform UK, the anti-immigration party that expanded its footprint across England, Scotland and Wales as disillusioned voters increasingly turned toward nationalist and insurgent political movements.With nearly all ballots counted, Labour lost almost 1,400 council seats in England and relinquished control of several local authorities.

Reform UK secured nearly 1,500 of the roughly 5,000 council seats contested, while the Green Party also posted strong gains with more than 500 seats won.The outcome was particularly severe in Wales, where Labour lost control of the devolved government for the first time since the Welsh parliament was established in 1999.

Nationalist party Plaid Cymru emerged as the largest political force, followed by Reform UK, with Labour falling to third place.In Scotland, the Scottish National Party retained its position as the largest party but failed to secure an outright majority, winning six fewer seats than in the previous regional elections in 2021.

Although Labour’s performance in London was less damaging than some party officials had feared, the broader results underscored mounting public unease over the government’s economic record and a series of policy reversals and political controversies since taking office.

The election setback comes as British households continue to face persistent cost-of-living pressures, sluggish economic growth and strained public services, conditions that have increasingly benefited smaller opposition parties and anti-establishment movements.

Nearly 1.5 million voters were registered across the Israeli-occupied West Bank, while around 70,000 were eligible to vote in Gaza’s Deir El-Balah area, according to the Ramallah-based Central Elections Commission.

Polling stations opened at 7 a.m., with voting taking place under the shadow of continued conflict, institutional paralysis, and long-standing frustration over the absence of national elections.

Footage from Al-Bireh in the West Bank and Deir El-Balah in Gaza showed election workers preparing polling centers as residents arrived to cast ballots in what many described as a symbolic rather than transformative process.

Most electoral lists were aligned with President Mahmoud Abbas’s secular-nationalist Fatah movement or were running as independents.There were no lists affiliated with Hamas, which governs much of Gaza and remains Fatah’s principal political rival.In many municipalities, including Ramallah and Nablus, only one list was submitted, resulting in automatic victory without a contested vote.

Where competition existed, Fatah-backed candidates faced independent lists, some led by figures associated with leftist factions such as the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.Mahmud Bader, a businessman from Tulkarem in the northern West Bank, said he would vote despite believing the outcome would have little practical effect.

“Whether candidates are independent or partisan, it has no effect and will have no effect or benefit for the city,” he said.“The occupation is the one that rules Tulkarem. It would only be an image shown to the international media — as if we have elections, a state or independence.

”Tulkarem has been under heightened Israeli military pressure, with two adjacent refugee camps remaining under military control for more than a year.In Gaza, the vote in Deir El-Balah marked the first local electoral exercise since Hamas won the 2006 legislative elections and later took control of the enclave in 2007.

Political analysts said the Palestinian Authority’s decision to hold voting only in Deir El-Balah reflected both logistical limits and a cautious test of public sentiment in post-war Gaza.Jamal Al-Fadi, a political scientist at Cairo’s Al-Azhar University, said the limited vote served as an “experiment” because there had been no reliable post-war opinion polling.

Deir El-Balah was selected partly because it was one of the few areas in Gaza where much of the population had remained in place and not been displaced during more than two years of war.Farah Shaath, 25, said voting for the first time was emotionally significant despite the extraordinary conditions.

“Although it is unlike any election in the world, it is a confirmation of our continued existence in the Gaza Strip despite everything,” she said.The elections commission said polling staff in Gaza were recruited from civil society groups and that a private security company had been contracted to secure voting centers.

However, a commission source in Gaza said Hamas police insisted on overseeing security around polling stations through unarmed personnel in civilian clothing.

UN coordinator Ramiz Alakbarov praised the organization of the vote, calling it a “credible process” and saying the elections represented an important opportunity for Palestinians to exercise democratic rights during an exceptionally difficult period.

Abbas, now 90, has remained in office for more than two decades without re-election, despite repeated promises of legislative and presidential polls that have yet to materialize.

Saturday’s municipal vote, while limited in scope, reflects both the persistence of Palestinian civic institutions and the deep uncertainty surrounding the future of governance in both Gaza and the West Bank.