At Jemo Health Centre on the outskirts of Addis Ababa, health worker Tewodros Tibebu says social stigma and limited awareness continue to delay access to comprehensive abortion care, despite Ethiopia legalizing broad abortion services more than two decades ago.

Tibebu, who has worked in comprehensive abortion care for four years, is among only three trained providers currently delivering the service at the facility. According to his account, many patients arrive after significant delays, often seeking help only after complications emerge from procedures carried out elsewhere.

“The biggest challenge is stigma,” Tibebu said in a feature published by the World Health Organization on May 5. “Many women are afraid someone will recognize them when they come here. Others do not even know the service exists.”Comprehensive abortion care has reportedly been available at Jemo Health Centre for nearly a decade.

However, Tibebu said access barriers remain widespread, particularly for women seeking confidential and medically supervised treatment.According to his account, many patients first visit private clinics where procedures may be carried out by practitioners lacking formal training in abortion care. By the time some women reach public facilities such as Jemo, they are already suffering from infections or sepsis that could have been prevented through earlier medical intervention.

Ethiopia expanded legal access to abortion in 2005 under revised provisions that allowed the procedure under broader circumstances than previously permitted. Despite the legal framework, health care providers and reproductive health organizations have continued to report uneven access across regions, driven by social stigma, provider shortages and gaps in public awareness.

Tibebu said the stigma surrounding abortion services affects providers as well as patients. “Some coworkers oppose the comprehensive abortion care department,” he said. “Some people in my community do not know what I do.”The social pressures attached to abortion care are a recurring issue in reproductive health systems globally, particularly in countries where legal reforms have outpaced shifts in public attitudes or health infrastructure.

Health workers often face professional isolation, ethical scrutiny and personal criticism while providing services that remain politically and culturally contested.Tibebu said professional training helped him better understand both the clinical and ethical dimensions of abortion care. “Before, it was difficult,” he said.

“After I received specific training, I understood the work differently and could provide the care women need.”The experiences described by Tibebu formed part of a broader announcement by the Human Reproduction Programme, known as HRP, regarding a new international training initiative on comprehensive abortion care.

The programme, launched through the WHO Academy platform, combines four separate learning modules focused on medical abortion, surgical abortion, post-abortion care and human rights integration in comprehensive abortion care. According to HRP, the courses are designed to provide modular and interactive learning environments that simulate real clinical decision-making scenarios encountered by frontline health workers.

WHO said the training initiative is intended to strengthen evidence-based care and improve consistency in abortion services across different health systems. The programme also places emphasis on privacy, non-discrimination and accountability within clinical practice.

The human rights integration component links medical treatment with broader principles related to patient dignity and access to care, according to WHO. Together, the courses are intended to establish a standardized framework for providers working in comprehensive abortion care settings.The launch reflects continuing international efforts by global health organizations to reduce preventable maternal complications associated with unsafe abortion procedures.

WHO has repeatedly stated in policy guidance that access to trained providers, accurate information and safe clinical environments are central to reducing maternal morbidity and mortality.At facilities such as Jemo Health Centre, providers say the gap between legal availability and practical access remains significant.

Tibebu noted that many patients learn about the service only through informal networks and word-of-mouth referrals rather than official health campaigns or referrals from primary care systems.That reliance on informal communication channels, he said, contributes to delays that can worsen medical outcomes.

The WHO feature also highlighted the operational pressures facing providers in facilities with limited staffing. With only three trained workers handling abortion care services at Jemo, workloads remain concentrated among a small number of clinicians.

Training programmes such as the one launched by HRP are intended in part to address those shortages by expanding provider knowledge and strengthening clinical capacity. WHO said the interactive nature of the courses allows health workers to engage with practical decision points similar to those encountered during patient care.

The organization has increasingly used digital and modular learning systems to expand access to specialized medical training, particularly in lower-resource health settings where formal clinical education opportunities may be limited.Tibebu said the training reinforced his understanding of abortion care not only as a technical medical service but also as direct patient support during periods of vulnerability and medical risk.

“People may not understand what we do,” he said. “But when you think about the woman in front of you, the decision is clear. You are helping someone.”WHO separately announced a webinar linked to the comprehensive abortion care learning programme scheduled for April 28, 2026.

The organization also published updated abortion-related fact sheets in December 2025 as part of its broader reproductive health guidance materials.The HRP programme operates jointly under the United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Population Fund, the United Nations Children’s Fund, WHO and the World Bank, focusing on research, policy development and training in human reproduction and reproductive health services.