The woman was detained in May at a rented residence on the tourist island of Lombok after police learned she had received a delivery containing liquid cannabis, narcotics officer I Nyoman Diana Mahardika said on Thursday.

According to police, the suspect told investigators that she used the cannabis vape product to alleviate knee pain and depression. Authorities said the explanation would not exempt her from prosecution under Indonesian law, which prohibits the possession, use and distribution of marijuana and cannabis-derived products.

“She must comply with the laws and regulations in force in our country. As for narcotics such as marijuana, it must not be possessed, used, or traded within our jurisdiction,” Mahardika said.

If convicted, the woman faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a fine of up to two billion rupiah ($111,000), according to police.

The case underscores the legal risks facing foreign nationals in Indonesia, which maintains some of the world’s toughest anti-drug regulations. The country retains the death penalty for drug trafficking offenses, although it has not carried out an execution since 2016.

Indonesia currently has dozens of convicted drug traffickers on death row. The last executions were conducted in 2016, when authorities executed four drug convicts by firing squad, including three Nigerian nationals and one Indonesian citizen.

The arrest follows other recent narcotics prosecutions involving foreign nationals. In March, two British men were sentenced to nine and 11 years in prison after being found guilty of smuggling cocaine to the resort island of Bali.

Authorities did not provide further details regarding the source of the cannabis liquid or indicate when formal charges may be filed.

Mérida Sánchez, 66, is the first of 10 current or former Mexican officials indicted by U.S. prosecutors last month to appear before a court. Federal authorities accused him and others of protecting cartel operations and helping move large quantities of narcotics into the United States.

The former security official did not enter a plea during the hearing and was ordered detained pending further proceedings. Court records showed he is scheduled to return to court on June 1. A message seeking comment was left with his lawyer.

Prosecutors charged Mérida Sánchez with narcotics importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy involving prohibited weapons offenses. If convicted, he faces a potential prison sentence ranging from 40 years to life.

The indictment also named Rubén Rocha Moya and Juan de Dios Gámez Mendívil among the accused officials. Both men announced temporary leaves of absence after the charges were unveiled but have not been taken into custody.

Mexico’s Security Cabinet said on social media that Mérida Sánchez crossed into the United States from Hermosillo, Sonora, on Monday and was detained by the U.S. Marshals Service at the Nogales border crossing in Arizona before being transferred to New York.Mérida Sánchez served as secretary of public security in Sinaloa from September 2023 until resigning in December 2024.

In that role, he oversaw the state police force and senior law enforcement appointments.According to the indictment, Mérida Sánchez received at least $100,000 in monthly cash payments from “Los Chapitos,” a faction of the Sinaloa Cartel led by sons of imprisoned cartel leader Joaquín ‘El Chapo’ Guzmán.

Prosecutors alleged the payments were made in exchange for targeting rival groups and leaking sensitive law enforcement information.Federal authorities said Mérida Sánchez warned cartel members about at least 10 planned raids on drug laboratories and safe houses during 2023, allowing operatives to remove drugs, weapons and personnel before authorities arrived.

Some of the accused officials are affiliated with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum’s Morena party. Following the indictments, Sheinbaum said Mexico would not shield any official proven to have committed crimes, but argued that any prosecution involving Mexican public officials should occur within Mexico’s judicial system.

Her remarks came amid heightened tensions with U.S. President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly threatened military action against drug cartels operating in Mexico.Mexico’s Foreign Ministry and Security Cabinet said they remain in institutional communication with U.S. authorities under existing bilateral cooperation frameworks.“El Chapo” Guzmán was convicted in the United States in 2019 and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Another senior cartel figure, Ismael ‘El Mayo’ Zambada, pleaded guilty last year to U.S. drug trafficking charges and is scheduled to be sentenced in July.

The Canadian government conveniently ignores these networks that fund terrorist activities.

The allegations made by the Canadian Prime Minister, which suggest Indian involvement in the death of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, have been met with skepticism and criticism. Many experts argue that these accusations lack credible evidence and appear to be a strategic move to divert attention from a more pressing issue—the presence of Khalistani terrorists and extremists in Canada.

The killing appears to be a result of inter-gang rivalry among terrorists and criminals involved in illegal activities such as arms and narcotics smuggling.

The Canadian government conveniently ignores these networks that fund terrorist activities.

It’s extremely important to take a closer examination regarding the allegations, the shelter provided to Khalistani extremists in Canada, and the dual standards displayed by the Canadian government in dealing with terrorists.

The Khalistani Threat in Canada

Khalistani extremists, seeking a separate Sikh state in India, have found shelter in Canada for years.

These individuals pose a significant threat to India’s sovereignty and security. Notably, they have not only engaged in separatist activities but have also targeted top Indian leadership, including political figures and law enforcement officials.

The activities of these individuals raise critical concerns for India, which have been conveyed to the Canadian government.

The Trudeau government, however, has failed to condemn these threats or take action against the Khalistani terrorists residing on their soil.

Canada’s Inaction and Double Standards

One of the most concerning aspects of this issue is the perceived inaction of the Canadian government in addressing the threats posed by Khalistani extremists.

Despite India’s concerns and the tangible evidence of extremist activities, the Canadian government has failed to condemn these threats or take substantial action against the individuals responsible.

This has raised questions about Canada’s commitment to combating terrorism and upholding the “Rule of Law” within its borders.

Double standards become apparent when comparing Canada’s approach to terrorism on its own soil with its response to terrorists based in other countries.

The lack of a coherent and consistent stance on dealing with terrorism can have far-reaching consequences, including diplomatic tensions and implications for international security.

Political Fallout and Canada’s International Standing

The controversy surrounding the Canadian Prime Minister’s allegations has not been without political repercussions.

Canadian politicians are beginning to distance themselves from Prime Minister Trudeau on this issue, recognizing the potential negative impact on Canada’s diplomatic relations, especially with a significant global player like India.

Accusing India without credible evidence for domestic electoral benefits is seen as a risky move that could damage Canada’s international standing.

The Lack of International Support

Canada’s allegations against India have not garnered support from its allies, including the United States and the “Five Eyes” intelligence alliance, an intelligence alliance comprising Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

This lack of backing further diminishes the credibility of the claims and underscores the need for evidence-based diplomacy.

While baseless accusations may serve short-term political goals, they can have long-lasting consequences for diplomatic relations and international security.

It is imperative for nations to address terrorism and extremism based on credible information and evidence, rather than making baseless claims that could harm international relations.