“They can’t do anything—it’s like they’re kidnapped there. We, their family members, want to help, but it’s not in our hands.”

Relatives of immigrants detained at the Delaney Hall immigration detention facility in New Jersey say they are increasingly concerned about the wellbeing of their loved ones as a hunger and labor strike over alleged conditions inside the center enters its third week, drawing protests, political scrutiny and competing claims from detainees, government officials and the facility’s private operator.

At the center of those concerns is Elder Guerra, a Guatemalan immigrant who has been held at Delaney Hall for nearly five months while contesting his deportation case. According to a family member who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation, Guerra suffered a serious fall in mid-May while showering inside the facility.

The relative said Guerra slipped, struck the back of his head and lost consciousness before experiencing a seizure. Other detainees reportedly urged guards to seek emergency medical assistance before Guerra was transported to a hospital.

He was later returned to Delaney Hall and placed in a medical isolation unit.Nearly three weeks after the incident, the relative said Guerra continues to experience severe headaches, dizziness, sensitivity to light, fatigue and hearing problems in one ear.”He needs medical attention.

He’s not in an adequate place to recover,” the relative said.The case has become one of several cited by detainees, advocates and family members who accuse authorities and facility operators of failing to provide adequate medical care and humane living conditions at Delaney Hall, a detention center operated by the private prison company GEO Group under contract with federal immigration authorities.

The facility has become the focus of mounting controversy since detainees launched a hunger and labor strike on May 22. Participants say the action was prompted by concerns over medical treatment, food quality, sanitation, drinking water and living conditions.

According to a letter released by detainees on May 31, those held inside the facility described what they called conditions “not fit for human beings over such a long period of time.”The letter alleged medical neglect, contaminated drinking water, expired food, unusable bathrooms and poorly maintained ventilation systems that detainees claim have contributed to frequent illness.

The detainees also demanded faster processing of immigration cases, the release of elderly and sick detainees, a meeting with New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill and an end to what they described as pressure from immigration officials to sign deportation documents.

The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to detailed requests for comment cited in the report.As attention surrounding the facility has intensified, demonstrations outside Delaney Hall have expanded.

Protesters have accused federal authorities and facility staff of mistreating detainees, while law enforcement agencies have responded to demonstrations with crowd-control measures that have included pepper spray, tear gas, arrests and the use of Tasers, according to accounts from participants and observers.

Family members arriving for visits described emotional encounters with relatives held inside the detention center.Guerra’s relative said his detained family member repeatedly pleaded for assistance during a recent visit following the accident.”He kept telling me, ‘Help me.

I need to leave here,'” the relative said.The emotional strain has extended beyond those detained. Family members interviewed outside the facility described anxiety, frustration and uncertainty as they navigate changing visitation rules while attempting to support relatives facing immigration proceedings.

Christopher Castro, who traveled with his mother from Long Island to visit his father, said detainees were increasingly seeking legal avenues to secure release.”My dad told me that a lot of people inside are pushing their lawyers to get them out,” Castro said after a visit.

Many families expressed concern that participation in the hunger strike could result in retaliation. Several detainees have reportedly chosen not to join the protest because they fear transfers, disciplinary measures or adverse effects on their immigration cases.

Those concerns have been amplified by allegations contained in detainees’ public statements.In their latest letter, strike participants claimed that since the protest began they had faced intimidation, discrimination and threats from both facility staff and immigration authorities.

Detainees alleged they had been threatened with deportation, transfer to other detention centers and placement in disciplinary housing units.GEO Group rejected those allegations.”GEO strongly refutes these allegations,” a company spokesperson said, stating that the facility provides around-the-clock medical care, legal and family visitation, translation services, religious accommodations and meals approved by dietitians.

The company referred questions regarding individual detainee cases to federal authorities.The dispute over conditions at Delaney Hall has unfolded amid broader national debate over immigration enforcement policies and detention practices.Federal officials have frequently described those arrested and detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement as serious offenders.

However, a recent review of ICE data conducted by Syracuse University researcher Austin Kocher found that the overwhelming majority of detainees held at Delaney Hall had no criminal convictions.According to Kocher’s analysis of mid-March detention data, approximately 88% of detainees held at the facility had no criminal conviction, while more than 70% had no criminal history at all.

Among those with convictions, many were associated with relatively low-level offenses.The findings have become a focal point for advocates who argue that public portrayals of immigration detainees often differ from available government data.

The controversy has also drawn the attention of elected officials. Oversight visits conducted by members of Congress and state officials have reportedly identified conditions consistent with complaints raised by detainees and their advocates.

One of the most visible activists connected to the protests is Gabriela Soto, whose husband Martin was detained at Delaney Hall before being transferred to another ICE facility. Soto said visits to the detention center motivated her to become involved in organizing demonstrations.”Once I started going to the visits and started seeing these people tell their stories, it made me so angry that they don’t have a voice,” she said.

Soto cited reports from detainees alleging spoiled food and unsanitary conditions as key reasons for her activism.Federal officials have repeatedly rejected allegations that detention conditions at Delaney Hall are inadequate.

The Department of Homeland Security has denied claims that detainees are being held in what it describes as “sub-prime” conditions and has similarly disputed comparable allegations involving other immigration detention facilities.Delaney Hall occupies a significant position within the federal detention system.

Operated by GEO Group, the largest private prison company in the United States, the facility is covered by a contract valued at approximately $1 billion over 15 years.For many families, however, the political debate remains secondary to concerns about loved ones inside the facility.

Guerra’s relative said he has hesitated to return for another visit after learning that visitors were being asked to provide identifying information before entering the center. He remains focused on securing medical treatment and legal assistance for his detained family member.”What is happening is inhumane,” he said. “They should have mercy. They’re human beings.”

With one year remaining before the 2026 FIFA World Cup reaches its final stages across the United States, Canada and Mexico, many football supporters living in host cities say anticipation for the tournament is being overshadowed by concerns over ticket prices, political tensions, infrastructure challenges and what they describe as the growing commercialization of the sport.

Interviews with fans across North America reveal a complex picture of public sentiment toward the first 48-team World Cup, which will be jointly hosted by three countries and feature a record number of participating nations.

While many supporters remain enthusiastic about welcoming the world’s largest football tournament to their home cities, numerous fans expressed frustration that attending matches may be financially out of reach for ordinary spectators.In Houston, longtime resident Ian Sherman said the prospect of hosting seven World Cup matches initially generated significant excitement.

However, he said that enthusiasm has diminished as ticket prices have become clearer and access to seats has proven difficult.Sherman pointed to prices exceeding $200 for upper-level seats at some group-stage matches and said many fans may ultimately be forced to rely on secondary markets if they hope to attend games involving major national teams.

Although football’s popularity has grown substantially in the United States over the past two decades, he said Houston remains primarily focused on American football, baseball and basketball.He also raised concerns about the city’s ability to absorb large numbers of visitors, citing traffic congestion and infrastructure pressures that could emerge during the tournament.

In Kansas City, local resident Parker McDowell said pride in hosting the World Cup has been accompanied by concern over broader political and security issues. While welcoming the city’s role as a base camp for several national teams, including England, Argentina, Algeria and the Netherlands, he said international visitors may be surprised by the region’s dependence on automobiles and limited public transportation options.

He also cited worries about global events, ticket affordability and public safety, including concerns surrounding gun violence in American cities.Political concerns emerged repeatedly among supporters interviewed across host locations. Several fans questioned whether current geopolitical developments align with the tournament’s traditional image as an event intended to unite nations through sport.

One supporter argued that restrictions affecting citizens of some countries and ongoing international conflicts have complicated perceptions of the tournament’s inclusiveness. Others criticized FIFA President Gianni Infantino and football’s governing body more broadly, claiming commercial and political considerations have increasingly overshadowed supporters’ interests.

In Mexico City, Francisco Fontano Patán described the tournament as a missed opportunity for urban development despite the city’s status as one of the competition’s flagship venues.Patán said local authorities had an opportunity to improve long-term transportation infrastructure around the city’s southern districts, including areas surrounding the iconic stadium formerly known as Azteca Stadium.

Instead, he said residents have seen only limited improvements that are unlikely to provide lasting benefits after the tournament concludes.He also argued that rising costs have distanced the event from ordinary citizens, leaving many supporters unable to attend matches in person.

Although public viewing events and fan festivals are expected across Mexico, Patán said those experiences are not significantly different from previous tournaments hosted elsewhere and do not compensate for the inability of many local residents to access stadium tickets.

Similar concerns were voiced in Monterrey, another Mexican host city. Resident Jose Galindo said excitement remains high because of the World Cup’s global significance, but acknowledged that many people cannot afford tickets or official merchandise.Galindo said the tournament increasingly feels like a premium product aimed at wealthier consumers rather than ordinary football supporters.

Nevertheless, he expects public viewing areas and informal gatherings to help create a festive atmosphere as the competition approaches.In Miami, Geoff Willerton said he remains excited about the tournament but does not personally know anyone planning to attend matches because of the costs involved.

While fan zones may offer an alternative, he said local awareness and excitement currently appear limited.Across several American host cities, supporters described a notable absence of visible World Cup enthusiasm despite the tournament’s proximity.

In New York, one resident suggested the event could struggle to compete for public attention in a city accustomed to hosting major international gatherings. Although the World Cup final will take place at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, he said many New Yorkers remain largely unaware of the event’s significance.Philadelphia resident James Powell said his own enthusiasm has declined steadily as ticket prices increased and concerns about FIFA’s governance intensified.

While he originally planned to attend matches, he now expects to watch from outside the stadium unless costs become more manageable.Powell said discussion of the World Cup remains relatively uncommon in Philadelphia despite the city’s role as a host venue.

Among the strongest criticism came from supporters in Northern California, where fans expressed disappointment over both ticket prices and the perceived lack of planning around public celebrations.San Francisco resident Ali said many football supporters had expected a festival atmosphere that would bring together fans from around the world.

Instead, uncertainty surrounding fan zones and the cost of attending matches has left many feeling excluded from an event taking place in their own region.Ali criticized organizers for prioritizing sponsors, corporate guests and VIP experiences over ordinary supporters.

He also questioned whether event planners fully understand the cultural significance of the World Cup compared with other major sporting events in North America.Despite widespread criticism, several supporters expressed optimism that local communities will ultimately embrace the tournament as kickoff approaches.

In Seattle, Roger Paul Probert-Baker described strong enthusiasm among residents and pointed to the city’s long football tradition, including support for the local club team and extensive experience hosting major sporting events.Probert-Baker said his family plans to participate in fan activities throughout the tournament and noted that preparations for security and crowd management are already underway.

He expressed confidence that Seattle will provide a welcoming environment for international visitors.Toronto residents also anticipate a vibrant atmosphere. Supporters there highlighted the city’s multicultural population and history of large public celebrations during previous World Cups.

Fans from numerous national backgrounds are expected to gather in neighborhoods, restaurants and public spaces to support their respective teams.

While enthusiasm varies across host cities, a common theme emerged from conversations with supporters throughout North America: the belief that the World Cup remains one of sport’s most powerful events, even as concerns over affordability, accessibility and governance continue to shape expectations.

For many fans, the challenge is not a lack of interest in football or the tournament itself. Rather, it is the perception that the event has become increasingly difficult for ordinary supporters to experience firsthand, despite being staged in their own communities.

New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill said state police took control of the area following confrontations between protesters and federal immigration agents. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka also imposed a nightly curfew around the facility.

The 1,000-bed detention center, operated by GEO Group on behalf of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has become a flashpoint in the debate over immigration enforcement under President Donald Trump. State police arrested three protesters on Saturday after six arrests the previous night.

Democratic leaders, including Hakeem Jeffries, renewed calls for the facility’s closure, citing concerns over detention conditions, while federal authorities said operations would continue as normal.