Speaking during an official visit to Vilnius, Volodymyr Zelenskiy said Ukraine is now waiting only for confirmation from its partners on the date and venue for signing the agreement.

According to Zelenskiy, the proposed guarantees place the United States at the centre of Ukraine’s future security framework, reflecting Kyiv’s belief that American backing is essential for long-term stability.

He added that once the document is signed, it will move to the next stage of democratic approval through ratification in both the US Congress and the Ukrainian parliament.

The announcement follows a fresh round of diplomatic engagement aimed at exploring pathways to end the nearly four-year conflict between Ukraine and Russia.

Over the weekend, negotiators from Ukraine and Russia met in Abu Dhabi alongside US mediators for the first trilateral talks of this kind, though no final agreement was reached.

Despite the lack of a breakthrough, officials from both Moscow and Kyiv signalled a willingness to continue discussions, suggesting that diplomatic momentum has not entirely stalled.

Zelenskiy described the talks as difficult but noted that the number of contentious issues under discussion has decreased compared to earlier stages.

Central to the negotiations is a US-backed framework reportedly containing around 20 points, designed to outline possible steps toward de-escalation and a political settlement.

While many of these points remain sensitive, Zelenskiy indicated that progress has been made in narrowing disagreements, even if core differences persist.

One of the most divisive issues continues to be territorial control in eastern Ukraine, where fighting has raged since the start of the full-scale invasion.

Zelenskiy said Russia is pressing Ukraine to abandon claims over regions it has failed to fully occupy, a demand Kyiv has firmly rejected.

Ukraine’s position, he stressed, remains unchanged, with territorial integrity seen as non-negotiable under international law.

Any proposal that compromises Ukraine’s sovereignty, Zelenskiy said, would be unacceptable to both the government and the Ukrainian public.

The Ukrainian leader acknowledged that compromise is a necessary part of diplomacy but argued that it cannot come at the cost of fundamental national principles.

He added that mediators, including the United States, face the difficult task of bridging two fundamentally different positions held by Kyiv and Moscow.

If signed, the US security guarantees document could reshape Ukraine’s defence posture and its relationship with Western allies.

Analysts say such guarantees may deter future aggression by clarifying the extent of international support Ukraine would receive in the event of renewed conflict.

Zelenskiy’s remarks in Vilnius also highlighted the importance of continued European engagement, as Ukraine works closely with regional partners such as Lithuania and Poland.

These alliances, he said, reinforce Ukraine’s diplomatic standing and underline the broader regional stakes involved in ending the war.

While uncertainty remains over the timing and outcome of further talks, Kyiv appears eager to maintain diplomatic pressure while strengthening its security arrangements.

For Ukraine, the completion of the US guarantees document represents not an end to the conflict, but a potential foundation for a more secure future.

Speaking after the talks, Zelenskiy said the framework for security guarantees for Ukraine had been finalised, marking a key step forward in negotiations that Kyiv sees as essential to any lasting peace. However, he stressed that territorial integrity remains the most sensitive and unresolved issue, underscoring the deep divisions that still exist between the warring sides.

Zelenskiy also announced that negotiators from Ukraine, Russia and the United States are set to hold trilateral talks for the first time in Abu Dhabi on Friday and Saturday. He framed the meetings as a positive development and a potential breakthrough, as direct engagement among all three parties has been limited since the conflict began.

Alongside security discussions, Zelenskiy said an agreement on Ukraine’s post-war economic recovery is close to completion. Such a deal would be a cornerstone of Kyiv’s strategy to rebuild infrastructure and revive growth after years of devastation, while also countering earlier peace proposals that Ukrainian officials believe leaned too heavily in Moscow’s favour.

Both leaders struck an optimistic tone after their meeting. Trump told reporters the discussion with Zelenskiy had been good and described the peace process as ongoing, while reiterating his belief that the war must end. He confirmed that U.S. envoys were travelling to Moscow to continue talks, adding to a flurry of high-level diplomatic activity.

Zelenskiy, who has made security guarantees a precondition for broader negotiations, said earlier this week that he would only attend Davos if agreements with Washington could be reached. Ukraine continues to face an energy crisis at home after repeated Russian air strikes damaged power and heating infrastructure, leaving millions without basic services during winter.

The Ukrainian leader accused Russia of attempting to freeze civilians into submission through sustained attacks on energy facilities, describing the strategy as a form of warfare against the population. He questioned why Russian President Vladimir Putin had not yet faced accountability, drawing comparisons with other international cases pursued by the United States.

U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff said progress was being made in peace talks after meeting Ukrainian and Russian officials in Davos. He added that if all sides genuinely wanted a solution, an agreement was achievable, echoing cautious optimism among diplomats observing the process.

Witkoff and fellow U.S. envoy Jared Kushner were expected to meet Putin in Moscow later on Thursday, before heading to Abu Dhabi for further discussions. The talks are set to include military-level contacts and debate over a broader economic package linked to a potential settlement.

Russia has reacted cautiously to the U.S.-led initiative, maintaining demands that Ukraine cede parts of eastern territory, including areas Moscow has struggled to fully control militarily. Putin has said discussions would include reconstruction of occupied regions and proposals for new international peace mechanisms.

Financial markets responded positively to the diplomatic activity, with Ukraine’s international bonds rallying as investors grew hopeful that negotiations could lead to an end to Europe’s deadliest conflict since World War Two. Despite the talks, fighting continued on the ground, with Russian strikes hitting several Ukrainian cities and causing civilian casualties.

The delegation is expected to engage with key figures involved in shaping the US approach to the conflict, focusing on the details of a proposed peace framework. Ukrainian officials have emphasized that their objective is not merely a ceasefire, but a settlement that ensures long term stability and sovereignty.

According to officials in Kyiv, the talks will center on security guarantees that could protect Ukraine from future aggression once hostilities end. These discussions are seen as essential, given the scale of the conflict and the ongoing fighting along a front line stretching over vast territory.

Despite repeated diplomatic efforts over the past several years, the war has shown no signs of fully de escalating. Military engagements continue daily, underscoring the urgency behind the latest negotiations taking place on American soil.

Ukraine and the United States have reportedly worked together on a detailed peace proposal containing multiple points addressing military, political, and economic concerns. However, the absence of a clear response from Russia remains one of the biggest obstacles to progress.

Among the most sensitive topics expected to dominate the talks are territorial questions, future defense arrangements, and the status of critical infrastructure under occupation. These issues are deeply complex and carry significant consequences for regional and global security.

Ukrainian officials have also indicated that post war reconstruction will form a key part of the agenda. Years of conflict have caused extensive damage to infrastructure, housing, and industry, making international investment crucial for recovery.

President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has expressed hope that upcoming international meetings will help unlock large scale reconstruction funding. Such investments are viewed as vital not only for rebuilding Ukraine, but also for ensuring economic resilience in the years following the war.

The United States has played a central role in diplomatic efforts aimed at resolving the conflict, with President Trump personally urging both Kyiv and Moscow to move toward an agreement. His administration’s involvement has added renewed momentum, even as battlefield realities remain difficult.

Officials involved in the talks have described the current phase as decisive, noting that prolonged delays could harden positions on all sides. The challenge lies in balancing compromise with the need to preserve Ukraine’s core national interests.

As negotiations continue, expectations remain cautious rather than optimistic. Past rounds of dialogue have often ended without concrete outcomes, highlighting how difficult it is to bridge the gap between diplomatic proposals and realities on the ground.

The visit underscores Ukraine’s determination to pursue every available diplomatic channel. It also signals that international engagement remains a key pillar of Kyiv’s strategy to secure a just and lasting peace.

Talks remain ongoing. No final agreement has been reached.

The renewed diplomatic outreach comes as Kyiv faces growing pressure to accelerate peace efforts while safeguarding national sovereignty and securing guarantees against future aggression.

Zelenskiy has indicated that direct talks with Trump are essential to assess Washington’s willingness to back Ukraine with firm security commitments extending beyond a temporary ceasefire.

Ukrainian officials say such guarantees are critical to prevent Russia from regrouping and launching renewed military action once hostilities are paused.

At the center of the talks are disputes over territory in eastern Ukraine and control of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, Europe’s largest such facility.

Kyiv remains firmly opposed to Russian demands that it cede parts of the Donetsk region, which has endured prolonged fighting and heavy destruction.

Although Russian forces occupy significant areas, Ukraine continues to hold key sections and views withdrawal as politically and strategically unacceptable.

The future of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant has also emerged as a major sticking point, given its importance to Ukraine’s energy security and regional safety.

Zelenskiy has stressed that any agreement involving strategic assets or territory must include strong enforcement mechanisms and international oversight.

Speaking to journalists, he emphasized that diplomatic progress depends heavily on sustained pressure from the United States on Moscow.

According to Zelenskiy, Washington possesses significant economic and political leverage that could shift Russia’s calculus if used decisively.

He has pointed to recent US actions elsewhere as evidence that firm pressure can alter entrenched political behavior.

Despite diplomatic activity, Russian forces continue air strikes against Ukrainian cities and energy infrastructure, complicating efforts to build trust around negotiations.

Zelenskiy argues that ongoing attacks undermine confidence in Russia’s commitment to any ceasefire arrangement.

In recent talks held in Paris, Ukraine’s allies expressed readiness to support a ceasefire through measures such as a multinational troop presence.

However, Kyiv has noted that many of these assurances remain political statements rather than legally binding commitments approved by national legislatures.

Ukrainian officials are seeking guarantees that would last more than 15 years, reflecting lessons learned from previous security arrangements that failed to deter aggression.

US and Ukrainian negotiators have revisited proposals related to territorial administration, including unconventional ideas aimed at breaking the impasse.

One such concept reportedly involves creating special economic arrangements in contested regions, though no formal agreement has been reached.

Zelenskiy has reiterated that any compromise on land must ultimately be decided by the Ukrainian people through a national referendum.

Public opinion surveys suggest that while many Ukrainians are open to freezing current front lines, there is strong resistance to formally surrendering territory.

This sentiment reflects the deep emotional and political cost of land concessions after years of conflict and civilian suffering.

The White House has not publicly commented on the prospect of a new meeting between Trump and Zelenskiy, leaving Kyiv awaiting clarity.

European partners continue to play a supportive role, but Ukraine views US leadership as indispensable to any durable settlement.

As negotiations proceed, the challenge lies in balancing urgency for peace with the need for credible safeguards that ensure Ukraine’s long-term independence.

Zelenskiy has framed the talks as not only about ending the current war but about shaping the security architecture of Eastern Europe for decades.

The coming weeks are expected to be decisive as negotiators test whether compromise is possible without undermining Ukraine’s core interests.

The proposal is outlined in a draft summit statement prepared ahead of a high-level meeting of the so-called Coalition of the Willing, bringing together more than two dozen leaders in Paris.

The summit aims to strengthen long-term security arrangements for Ukraine, particularly in the context of a potential ceasefire, and to deter any renewed aggression in the future.

According to the draft text, the guarantees could involve the use of military capabilities, intelligence sharing, logistical assistance, diplomatic action, and the adoption of additional sanctions if Ukraine is attacked again.

While the language reflects growing consensus among allies, the statement still requires approval from national capitals, highlighting the political sensitivity surrounding legally binding commitments.

Discussions on Ukraine’s security have evolved rapidly in recent weeks, moving beyond short-term military aid toward more durable and enforceable assurances.

Earlier debates largely focused on continued weapons supplies and the possibility of deploying an international reassurance force, but attention has now shifted toward formal obligations.

Diplomats say this change reflects recognition that Ukraine’s long-term safety cannot rely solely on ad hoc support or political declarations.

The idea of binding guarantees, however, raises complex questions within Europe, particularly around the potential requirement for a military response in the event of another conflict.

Ukraine has consistently argued that its security cannot be ensured without commitments comparable in strength to NATO’s collective defense principle.

Kyiv views such guarantees as essential to preventing future attacks and to underpinning any lasting peace arrangement.

Russia, by contrast, has made clear that it opposes any settlement that would allow Ukraine to join military alliances or receive NATO-style protections.

President Volodymyr Zelenskiy participated in the Paris meeting as part of a broader effort to align Ukrainian, European, and American positions before any engagement with Moscow.

He has emphasized a dual strategy of pursuing diplomacy while maintaining active defense, arguing that negotiations must be backed by credible security guarantees.

Zelenskiy has said that Ukraine is counting on concrete steps from partners that provide real protection and long-term stability for its people.

Talks aimed at ending the nearly four-year conflict have accelerated in recent months, though major gaps remain between Kyiv and Moscow.

Russia has yet to signal a willingness to compromise, particularly after Ukraine sought changes to earlier proposals that were seen as favoring Russian demands.

A senior European official said allies hope that firming up guarantees will also help anchor U.S. commitments, which have been discussed in bilateral talks with Kyiv.

The draft statement also envisions a U.S.-led ceasefire monitoring and verification mechanism with international participation, including contributions from coalition members.

In addition, allies plan to continue long-term military assistance and consider the establishment of a multinational force to support Ukraine’s security framework.

The Paris summit underscores a broader strategic recalibration, as Ukraine’s partners seek to move from temporary crisis management toward lasting deterrence and stability.

The in-person talks reflect renewed political engagement at the highest level, highlighting Washington’s continued involvement in shaping a possible path toward peace.

The meeting comes after weeks of behind-the-scenes negotiations aimed at crafting a comprehensive framework to reduce hostilities and stabilize the region.

For Kyiv, the Florida discussions offer an opportunity to present its perspective directly and seek balanced solutions that protect Ukraine’s sovereignty and long-term security.

Zelenskiy has emphasized dialogue as a necessary step toward ending prolonged suffering caused by the war.

The talks are expected to focus on contested regions in eastern Ukraine, the future of critical infrastructure, and broader security guarantees.

Despite ongoing military pressure, Ukrainian leadership has continued to prioritize diplomatic channels alongside defensive efforts.

Recent attacks on Ukrainian cities have reinforced the urgency of reaching an agreement that ensures civilian safety and restores essential services.

Zelenskiy has framed the peace discussions as a response to both battlefield realities and humanitarian concerns.

The Florida meeting also underscores the role of the United States as a key mediator with global influence.

Trump’s engagement reflects an interest in advancing negotiations that could reshape the trajectory of the conflict.

Prior communication between Washington and Moscow adds another layer of complexity but also signals active diplomatic engagement.

Ukrainian officials view direct dialogue with U.S. leadership as crucial to ensuring that any proposal reflects Ukraine’s core interests.

The evolving peace framework has reportedly reached an advanced stage, demonstrating progress despite remaining disagreements.

Zelenskiy has indicated that transparency and public consent will remain central to Ukraine’s approach.

Any final agreement, he has suggested, must carry legitimacy and reflect the will of the Ukrainian people.

European partners continue to play a supportive role, coordinating closely with Kyiv to strengthen post-war security arrangements.

These efforts aim to ensure long-term stability and deter future aggression.

The Florida talks are also expected to include consultations with European leaders, reinforcing a multilateral approach.

Such coordination highlights the international community’s shared stake in a durable peace.

While territorial questions remain sensitive, the willingness to engage reflects growing recognition that diplomacy is essential.

The discussions signal momentum toward compromise-driven solutions rather than prolonged confrontation.

Zelenskiy’s presence in Florida represents confidence in dialogue, even amid uncertainty.

His engagement demonstrates Ukraine’s readiness to pursue peace through negotiation without abandoning national principles.

The meeting also sends a broader signal to global markets and allies about continued efforts to de-escalate tensions.

Stability in Eastern Europe remains a key concern for international security and economic confidence.

By bringing decision-makers together, the talks create space for pragmatic problem-solving.

Observers see the meeting as a potential turning point in recalibrating diplomatic priorities.

Though challenges remain, sustained engagement increases the likelihood of incremental progress.

The Florida talks reinforce the idea that peace processes are built through persistence rather than single breakthroughs.

For Ukraine, maintaining international support remains vital during this critical phase.

Zelenskiy’s outreach underscores Kyiv’s commitment to diplomacy grounded in resilience and national unity.

As discussions unfold, attention will focus on whether common ground can be translated into concrete steps.

The meeting symbolizes cautious optimism that dialogue can gradually ease one of Europe’s most destabilizing conflicts.

The renewed meetings bring together Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, senior United States envoys, and key European leaders, reflecting a shared determination to explore pathways toward ending the conflict.

After lengthy discussions on Sunday, US representatives expressed optimism, noting tangible progress and constructive engagement among all sides involved in the dialogue.

The continuation of talks underscores the seriousness of the moment, as diplomatic efforts intensify to shape a framework for stability and long-term peace in Europe.

Ukraine has shown flexibility by signalling openness to alternative security arrangements in exchange for firm international guarantees, highlighting a pragmatic approach to safeguarding its sovereignty.

This willingness to explore compromise has been welcomed by several European leaders, who see it as a step toward unlocking broader consensus.

The Berlin talks are unfolding against the backdrop of a pivotal week for European diplomacy, with major decisions expected at the European Union level.

Later this week, EU leaders are set to consider financial mechanisms designed to support Ukraine’s economic resilience and reconstruction.

These measures are viewed as essential to ensuring that Ukraine remains economically stable while diplomatic negotiations continue.

European officials have emphasized that sustained financial and political backing is central to preserving peace and deterring future conflict.

Foreign ministers meeting in Brussels are also working to reinforce unity through coordinated policy responses and updated sanctions frameworks.

Despite complex geopolitical pressures, there is a visible effort among European capitals to present a cohesive and confident stance.

Several leaders have described the current phase as a rare opening, where sustained diplomacy could lead to meaningful de-escalation.

Finnish President Alexander Stubb captured this cautious optimism by describing the talks as the closest point yet to a viable peace arrangement.

Discussions are reportedly focusing on three interconnected pillars: a structured peace framework, reliable security guarantees, and a comprehensive reconstruction plan.

Together, these elements aim to address both immediate security needs and the long-term rebuilding of Ukraine’s economy and infrastructure.

European leaders attending the Berlin meetings have stressed the importance of inclusive dialogue involving Ukraine, the United States, and European partners.

This collective approach reflects a broader belief that durable peace can only be achieved through shared responsibility and cooperation.

The presence of multiple European heads of government highlights the depth of regional commitment to a negotiated solution.

At the same time, diplomatic engagement is being paired with clear messages about the importance of respecting international law and sovereignty.

European officials have reiterated that peace must be built on stability, not coercion, and on guarantees that prevent future escalation.

The talks also signal Europe’s intention to remain an active global actor capable of shaping outcomes through diplomacy rather than division.

As negotiations continue, there is growing recognition that the choices made this week could influence Europe’s security architecture for years to come.

The focus remains on creating conditions that allow for a ceasefire, followed by structured steps toward normalization and recovery.

For Ukraine, the talks represent both a challenge and an opportunity to secure lasting protection and international partnership.

For Europe, they offer a chance to demonstrate unity, leadership, and strategic maturity at a critical historical juncture.

Observers note that even incremental progress in Berlin carries symbolic weight, reinforcing faith in diplomacy amid prolonged conflict.

As the second day of talks unfolds, expectations remain measured but hopeful, with many leaders emphasizing patience and persistence.

The coming days are likely to test Europe’s cohesion, but they also present a rare opportunity to shape a more stable future.

If sustained, the dialogue underway in Berlin could mark the beginning of a new chapter centered on security, cooperation, and reconstruction.

The document begins by reaffirming Ukraine’s sovereignty and sets the expectation that Russia will refrain from invading its neighbors, while NATO, in turn, would halt further expansion as part of a broader non-aggression understanding meant to stabilize regional security conditions.

A key provision calls for a comprehensive non-aggression agreement among Russia, Ukraine, and Europe, declaring that strategic ambiguities of the past three decades would be considered settled as part of an effort to prevent future escalations and long-term disputes.

The proposal also urges renewed security dialogue between Russia and NATO, facilitated by the United States, with the goal of addressing mutual concerns, reducing military tensions, and building pathways for broader diplomatic communication and economic cooperation.

Ukraine would receive security guarantees under the plan, though the Ukrainian military would be capped at a force size of 600,000 personnel as part of measures intended to limit future militarization while preserving national defense capabilities.

One of the most pivotal points requires Ukraine to amend its constitution to formally rule out NATO membership, while NATO itself would revise internal rules to ensure the alliance does not consider Ukraine for future entry or deploy troops on Ukrainian territory.

European fighter jets would be stationed in Poland under the proposal to reinforce regional deterrence, reflecting ongoing commitments to European defense structures while preventing direct deployment inside Ukraine.

The United States would serve as a guarantor of the agreement under a set of conditions, including provisions that Ukraine would lose the guarantee if it launched an attack on Russia, while any renewed invasion by Russia would automatically restore full sanctions and trigger a coordinated military response.

Ukraine would remain eligible for European Union membership and would be granted preferential access to European markets while its candidacy was reviewed, representing an economic incentive within the broader settlement package.

A major redevelopment initiative would be established for Ukraine, including a dedicated development fund aimed at expanding sectors such as technology, data centers, infrastructure, and industrial capacity, with additional international support through financing from the World Bank.

The United States and Ukraine would jointly work to modernize and expand Ukraine’s gas infrastructure, redevelop cities affected by the war, and support broader reconstruction in regions damaged by conflict.

Russia would also be reintegrated into the global economy in stages, with sanctions relief negotiated gradually, a long-term economic cooperation agreement with the United States proposed, and the possibility of rejoining the G8 included as part of future normalization measures.

Frozen Russian assets would be partially allocated toward Ukraine’s reconstruction, while additional funds would be placed into a joint investment vehicle for U.S.–Russia projects meant to build shared interests and reduce incentives for future confrontation.

Security oversight would be managed by a joint U.S.–Russian task force, while Russia would formalize a non-aggression commitment toward both Ukraine and Europe and extend existing nuclear arms control treaties in cooperation with the United States.

The document requires Ukraine to remain a non-nuclear state and establishes international supervision for restarting the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, with the plant’s output shared equally between Russia and Ukraine.

Both countries would agree to implement domestic programs promoting cultural understanding, minority protections, and rejection of discriminatory practices or extremist ideologies as part of long-term social stabilization efforts.

The proposal outlines sensitive territorial arrangements, recognizing Crimea, Luhansk, and Donetsk as de facto Russian, freezing the lines of control in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, and designating certain areas as demilitarized buffer zones under international observation.

Provisions ensure Ukraine’s continued commercial access to the Dnieper River and free movement of grain exports through the Black Sea, while a humanitarian committee would handle exchanges of prisoners, civilian detainees, and displaced children.

The plan calls for Ukrainian elections within 100 days, full amnesty for wartime actions by all sides, and a legally binding peace structure monitored by an international Board of Peace chaired by the U.S. president, with penalties for violations and an immediate ceasefire once terms are accepted.