A judge in Islamabad sentenced 22-year-old Umar Hayat to death and imposed a fine of $7,200 after convicting him of fatally shooting the 17-year-old influencer at her home in the Pakistani capital, according to court proceedings witnessed by reporters.

Investigators said Hayat killed Yousaf in June 2025 after she repeatedly rejected his advances. Surveillance footage presented during the investigation showed the accused fleeing the scene carrying the victim’s mobile phone, while Yousaf’s mother and aunt were identified as eyewitnesses to the shooting.

Speaking outside the courtroom, Yousaf’s father said the ruling delivered a broader message against gender-based violence.

“This verdict is a lesson for anyone who commits such acts,” he told journalists alongside the victim’s mother.
Hayat initially confessed to the killing during the investigation before later retracting his statement.

Under Pakistan’s legal framework, the conviction and sentence remain subject to appeal in higher courts.
Yousaf had amassed millions of followers across social media platforms, particularly on TikTok, where she shared videos related to fashion, skincare and lifestyle content. She also discussed personal relationships and social pressures, subjects that remain sensitive in Pakistan’s conservative society.

Her killing triggered widespread public outrage and renewed scrutiny of online harassment and victim blaming targeting women in the country. Social media reactions following her death included both condolences and hostile comments accusing the teenager of provoking the violence against her.

Women’s rights groups organized demonstrations in Islamabad after the killing, demanding stronger protections for women and accountability for gender-based crimes.

The case drew comparisons to several high-profile killings of women in Pakistan linked to rejected romantic advances or disputes over social behavior. In 2016, social media personality Qandeel Baloch was murdered by her brother in a so-called honor killing that shocked the country.

In 2021, Noor Mukadam was killed by her Pakistani-American boyfriend after rejecting his marriage proposal, a case that also led to a death sentence.
Rights organizations and Pakistan’s Human Rights Commission have repeatedly warned that violence against women remains pervasive, with many cases linked to patriarchal attitudes, social stigma and weak enforcement of protections for women.

TikTok has grown rapidly in Pakistan in recent years, offering younger users particularly women access to audiences and income opportunities in a country where female participation in the formal workforce remains low.

Three women who helped secure the conviction of a London man for historic sexual offences say the bond they formed during the legal process has become central to their recovery, as growing numbers of survivors of sexual violence choose to waive anonymity and speak publicly about their experiences.

Laura Hughes, Lauren Preston and Mary Sharp, now in their 40s and 50s, describe themselves collectively as “the girls,” a term they say reflects the close emotional support network that emerged after years of trauma connected to the same abuser, Martin Butler.

The women, who maintain regular contact through a WhatsApp group called Sister Solidarity, said their friendship developed after Butler was convicted for offences committed decades earlier.Martin Butler is serving a lengthy prison sentence after being convicted of the rape and buggery of Mary Sharp in 1988.

During the prosecution, Hughes and Preston provided evidence about separate abuse they said they experienced from Butler during the 1990s. Butler was later convicted in another trial involving the historic rape of an unidentified teenage victim.According to the women, Butler operated within the same community in Ruislip, where Hughes and Preston grew up and attended school together.

Sharp also lived in the area, although she did not know the other two women at the time.The women said Butler, who was significantly older than Hughes and Preston when they were teenagers, cultivated influence over vulnerable young people through parties involving alcohol and drugs at his apartment.

In 2023, the women met for the first time after Butler’s conviction in the case involving Sharp. Their decision to speak publicly later drew wider attention and became the basis for a documentary examining the long-term effects of abuse and the role of survivor solidarity.

The women’s experiences come amid broader public discussion around sexual violence and survivor testimony. In recent years, more survivors have chosen to identify themselves publicly, arguing that open discussion can challenge stigma surrounding rape cases.

Gisèle Pelicot, whose case in France drew international attention after she publicly discussed repeated drug-facilitated sexual assaults, said she hoped removing anonymity would help shift social attitudes around shame and victimhood.

Hughes, Preston and Sharp said that while Butler’s conviction represented a significant moment, the process of recovery remained difficult and uneven. All three described ongoing emotional effects linked to the abuse and the court proceedings.

“We would never allow a man to use the word ‘girls’ about us, but we use it with each other,” Hughes said. “We all have the same demon, the same monster, but we are rising together.”

The women said public exposure and revisiting traumatic experiences during legal proceedings carried emotional costs. Preston said that speaking publicly initially intensified anxiety and distress.“For about a year, I went backwards,” she said.

“I started to really suffer from anxiety.”Sharp said the psychological effects of the abuse and subsequent legal process continue to surface periodically despite the support system the women have built together.“We are not out of the woods,” Sharp said.

“I do still have wobbly moments.”Mental health specialists and victim support groups have long noted that recovery from sexual violence can involve prolonged psychological impacts, even after successful prosecutions.

Survivors may continue to experience anxiety, trauma responses and emotional distress long after court proceedings conclude.The three women said mutual support has become one of the most important factors in rebuilding confidence and stability.“I feel like I have freed my childhood self,” Hughes said.

“I can look myself in the eye now, almost as if I have become my own parent.”She added that trauma remained a permanent part of her life experience but said shared understanding among the women had changed how she copes with it.“Someone said that pain is a skin you can’t take off,” Hughes said.

“I feel that’s true with me and my trauma. But having the girls helps me cope with living in that skin and getting stronger within it.”Preston said the court proceedings and subsequent documentary project altered how she viewed herself publicly and privately.

“Everything that has happened, the court case, the documentary, it does make me hold my head up higher,” she said. “I couldn’t have done any of this by myself.

The girls give me strength.”Sharp described the friendship as an enduring emotional responsibility shared among the three women.

“I feel stronger now,” she said. “I wouldn’t do anything to upset my girls. They are part of me now.”